SCYB ranks 2nd and SIHY 47th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
SCYB vs SIHY
SCYB −0.45pt a year
0.03%0.48%
SCYB 43.6×the volume
1.13M25.9K
SIHY +0.3pt
+7.5%+7.8%
SCYB vs SIHY Performance
+0.7%+1.2%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- SIHY 0.48%
- SCYB $2.74B
- SIHY $135M
- SCYB +2.5%
- SIHY +3.0%, better
- SCYB 7.17%
- SIHY 7.73%, better
- SCYB 1839
- SIHY 202
- SCYB 1.13M sh, better
- SIHY 25.9K sh
- SCYB $25.21
- SIHY $44.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCYB | SIHY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | C40 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A88 |
| Risk | B58Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | A77Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A100Higher | B63 |
| Durability | B68Higher | C52 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. SCYB and SIHY are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCYBA
SIHYB
In short
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
SIHY Most high yield ETFs just clone the index. SIHY hands the junk bond picking to a machine: Ares Systematic Credit runs a model-driven process across roughly 300 below-investment-grade bonds, and pays monthly.
Stated mandate
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
SIHY The ETF commits at least 80% of its net assets, plus investment-purpose borrowings, to below-investment-grade corporate bonds or equivalent unrated securities; derivatives may represent those investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCYB vs SIHY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCYB vs SIHY Cost
Overpaying SIHY vs SCYB
$8,967
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCYB 0.03%
$638
SIHY 0.48%
$9,605
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCYB | SIHY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $865 | $810 |
| 20 | $216 | $3,328 | $3,112 |
| 30 | $638 | $9,605 | $8,967 |
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- 0.48%SIHY
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
SIHY 50th cheapest of 84 funds
SCYB vs SIHY Dividends
- SCYB 7.17%
- SIHY 7.73%, better
- SCYB $1.81
- SIHY $3.40
- SCYB $0.16
- SIHY $0.26
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- SIHY Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- SIHY Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SCYB Monthly
- SIHY Monthly
Distribution history
SCYB vs SIHY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCYB 4.6%, betterSIHY 5.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCYB 0.82SIHY 0.83, better
- Worst fall
- SCYB −4.9%SIHY −13.3%
- Market sensitivity
- SCYB 0.28SIHY 0.68
SCYB and SIHY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
