SCYB ranks 2nd and XB 31st of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
SCYB vs XB
SCYB −0.27pt a year
0.03%0.30%
SCYB 165.6×the volume
1.1M6.67K
SCYB +0.3pt
+7.7%+7.4%
SCYB vs XB Performance
+2.0%+2.5%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- XB 0.30%
- SCYB $2.8B
- XB $94M
- SCYB +2.0%
- XB +2.5%, better
- SCYB 7.82%, better
- XB 7.72%
- SCYB 1844
- XB 648
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- XB 6.67K sh
- SCYB $25.22
- XB $37.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCYB | XB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A75 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A93 |
| Risk | B60Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | A99Higher | A85 |
| Durability | B68Higher | D33 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. SCYB and XB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCYBA
XBB
In short
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
XB High yield, sliced by credit grade. XB holds only the single-B tier, the fat middle of the junk market, leaving out BB near-investment-grade paper and CCC deep-distress names. One of the original ratings-specific high yield ETFs, trading since 2022.
Stated mandate
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
XB The fund is designed to provide exposure to U.S. dollar-denominated, below-investment-grade corporate debt in the B-rated segment of the high-yield bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCYB vs XB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCYB vs XB Cost
Overpaying XB vs SCYB
$5,511
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCYB 0.03%
$638
XB 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCYB | XB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $545 | $490 |
| 20 | $216 | $2,113 | $1,897 |
| 30 | $638 | $6,149 | $5,511 |
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- 0.30%XB
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
XB 21st cheapest of 84 funds
SCYB vs XB Dividends
- SCYB 7.82%, better
- XB 7.72%
- SCYB $1.96
- XB $2.91
- SCYB $0.16
- XB $0.23
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- XB Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- XB Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SCYB Monthly
- XB Monthly
Distribution history
SCYB vs XB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCYB 4.6%XB 4.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SCYB 0.82, betterXB 0.79
- Worst fall
- SCYB −4.9%XB −9.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SCYB 0.28XB 0.59
SCYB and XB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
