SCYB ranks 1st and YLD 44th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
SCYB vs YLD
SCYB −0.36pt a year
0.03%0.39%
SCYB 5.0×the volume
1.1M223K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+8.4%+8.4%
SCYB vs YLD Performance
+2.0%+2.9%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- YLD 0.39%
- SCYB $2.8B
- YLD $605M
- SCYB +2.0%
- YLD +2.9%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- YLD 7.62%, better
- SCYB 1844
- YLD 144
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- YLD 223K sh
- SCYB $25.22
- YLD $18.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCYB | YLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B58 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A72 |
| Risk | B59Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | A99Higher | C43 |
| Durability | B68Higher | B67 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. SCYB and YLD are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCYBA
YLDB
In short
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
YLD Most high yield ETFs just clone an index. YLD is the hand-built version: Principal's credit team blends junk bonds with senior floating-rate bank loans, at roughly what the average high yield ETF charges.
Stated mandate
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
YLD The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital through investments that include high-yield bonds and bank loans.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCYB vs YLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCYB vs YLD Cost
Overpaying YLD vs SCYB
$7,260
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCYB 0.03%
$638
YLD 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCYB | YLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $705 | $650 |
| 20 | $216 | $2,725 | $2,509 |
| 30 | $638 | $7,898 | $7,260 |
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- 0.39%YLD
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
YLD 31st cheapest of 84 funds
SCYB vs YLD Dividends
- SCYB 7.14%
- YLD 7.62%, better
- SCYB $1.80
- YLD $1.40
- SCYB $0.16
- YLD $0.11
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- YLD Oct 1, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- YLD Oct 5, 2026
- SCYB Monthly
- YLD Monthly
Distribution history
SCYB vs YLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCYB 4.6%YLD 4.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SCYB 0.82YLD 0.92, better
- Worst fall
- SCYB −4.9%YLD −13.8%
- Market sensitivity
- SCYB 0.28YLD 0.55
SCYB and YLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
