SDOW ranks 2nd and SOXS 5th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SDOW vs SOXS
0.0%by weight
SDOW −0.05pt a year
0.95%1.00%
SOXS 17.3×the volume
3.85M66.5M
SDOW +39.8pt
−37.6%−77.4%
SDOW vs SOXS Performance
−73.1%−99.9%
- SDOW 0.95%, better
- SOXS 1.00%
- SDOW $154M
- SOXS $3.97B
- SDOW −21.9%, better
- SOXS −91.8%
- SDOW 4.76%
- SOXS 22.76%, better
- SDOW 10
- SOXS 8
- SDOW 3.85M sh
- SOXS 66.5M sh, better
- SDOW $25.01
- SOXS $41.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SDOW | SOXS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | B64 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B69Higher | F7 |
| Tradability | A81 | A81 |
| Holdings | F0 | |
| Durability | B67Higher | B66 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SDOW and SOXS are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SDOWA
SOXSB
In short
SDOW The only -3x ETF pointed at the Dow. SDOW aims to deliver three times the inverse of the index's daily move, reset at each close, for 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
SOXS The bear half of Direxion's semiconductor pair. SOXS aims for 300% of the inverse of the NYSE Semiconductor Index for one trading day, then resets. A short-term instrument for doubting chips.
Stated mandate
SDOW SDOW seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to three times the inverse of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
SOXS The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the inverse of the NYSE Semiconductor Index's performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SDOW vs SOXS Holdings
How SDOW and SOXS differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SDOW and 0.0% of SOXS.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for SOXS.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for SOXS.
Concentration
- SDOW122.5%
- SOXS156.5%
- SDOW10
- SOXS0
Asset class
- SDOW
- Equity
- SOXS
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in SDOW10
- In both0
- Only in SOXS0
Only in SDOW
10 securities, 100% of SDOW by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf77.79%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-2913.80%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-109.88%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-084.61%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-033.31%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-103.30%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-243.29%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-313.28%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-121.97%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-171.32%
Only in SOXS
0 securities, 0.0% of SOXS by weight
Weight gaps
SDOW and SOXS share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SDOW vs SOXS Cost
Overpaying SOXS vs SDOW
$819
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SDOW 0.95%
$17,869
SOXS 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SDOW | SOXS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,763 | $85 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,625 | $303 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $18,688 | $819 |
- 0.95%SDOW, cheaper
- 1.00%SOXS
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SDOW 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
SOXS 6th cheapest of 14 funds
SDOW vs SOXS Dividends
- SDOW 4.76%
- SOXS 22.76%, better
- SDOW $1.19
- SOXS $11.85
- SDOW $0.29
- SOXS $0.44
- SDOW Sep 23, 2026
- SOXS Sep 22, 2026
- SDOW Sep 29, 2026
- SOXS Sep 29, 2026
- SDOW Quarterly
- SOXS Quarterly
Distribution history
SDOW vs SOXS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SDOW
- SOXS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SDOW 34.4%, betterSOXS 96.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- SDOW −1.22, betterSOXS −1.48
- Worst fall
- SDOW −85.1%, betterSOXS −100.0%
- Market sensitivity
- SDOW −2.46SOXS −4.67
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.