TZA ranks 4th and SOXS 5th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SOXS vs TZA
TZA −0.01pt a year
1.00%0.99%
SOXS 3.7×the volume
66.5M17.8M
TZA +35.6pt
−77.4%−41.8%
SOXS vs TZA Performance
−99.9%−79.9%
- SOXS 1.00%
- TZA 0.99%, better
- SOXS $3.97B
- TZA $191M
- SOXS −91.8%
- TZA −37.2%, better
- SOXS 22.76%, better
- TZA 4.06%
- SOXS 8
- TZA 7
- SOXS 66.5M sh, better
- TZA 17.8M sh
- SOXS $41.70
- TZA $44.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SOXS | TZA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B64 | B64 |
| Mission | A75 | |
| Risk | F7 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A81Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66Higher | B60 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SOXS and TZA are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SOXSB
TZAB
In short
SOXS The bear half of Direxion's semiconductor pair. SOXS aims for 300% of the inverse of the NYSE Semiconductor Index for one trading day, then resets. A short-term instrument for doubting chips.
TZA Born in the wreckage of 2008, TZA aims to move three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily swing. A heavily traded way to press a bearish small-cap view, with a daily reset that makes it a tool for days, not quarters.
Stated mandate
SOXS The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the inverse of the NYSE Semiconductor Index's performance.
TZA The Fund seeks daily inverse leveraged investment results equal to negative three times the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index. Its leverage makes it potentially riskier than nonleveraged alternatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SOXS vs TZA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SOXS vs TZA Cost
Overpaying SOXS vs TZA
$163
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SOXS 1.00%
$18,688
TZA 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SOXS | TZA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,746 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,565 | $60 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $18,525 | $163 |
- 1.00%SOXS
- 0.99%TZA, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
TZA 5th cheapest of 14 funds
SOXS 6th cheapest of 14 funds
SOXS vs TZA Dividends
- SOXS 22.76%, better
- TZA 4.06%
- SOXS $11.85
- TZA $1.90
- SOXS $0.44
- TZA $0.47
- SOXS Sep 22, 2026
- TZA Sep 22, 2026
- SOXS Sep 29, 2026
- TZA Sep 29, 2026
- SOXS Quarterly
- TZA Quarterly
Distribution history
SOXS vs TZA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SOXS
- TZA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SOXS 96.2%TZA 53.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SOXS −1.48TZA −1.01, better
- Worst fall
- SOXS −100.0%TZA −92.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SOXS −4.67TZA −3.25
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.