SRTY ranks 3rd and SOXS 5th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SOXS vs SRTY
SRTY −0.05pt a year
1.00%0.95%
SOXS 41.5×the volume
66.5M1.6M
SRTY +34.6pt
−77.4%−42.8%
SOXS vs SRTY Performance
−99.9%−82.0%
- SOXS 1.00%
- SRTY 0.95%, better
- SOXS $3.97B
- SRTY $68M
- SOXS −91.8%
- SRTY −37.4%, better
- SOXS 22.76%, better
- SRTY 5.87%
- SOXS 8
- SRTY 5
- SOXS 66.5M sh, better
- SRTY 1.6M sh
- SOXS $41.70
- SRTY $26.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SOXS | SRTY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B64 | A84Higher |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | F7 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | A81Higher | A70 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66Higher | B56 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SOXS and SRTY are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SOXSB
SRTYA
In short
SOXS The bear half of Direxion's semiconductor pair. SOXS aims for 300% of the inverse of the NYSE Semiconductor Index for one trading day, then resets. A short-term instrument for doubting chips.
SRTY A one-day instrument by design: SRTY aims for three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, and it has been the ProShares small-cap bear since 2010.
Stated mandate
SOXS The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the inverse of the NYSE Semiconductor Index's performance.
SRTY SRTY seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SOXS vs SRTY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SOXS vs SRTY Cost
Overpaying SOXS vs SRTY
$819
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SOXS 1.00%
$18,688
SRTY 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SOXS | SRTY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,678 | $85 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,322 | $303 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $17,869 | $819 |
- 1.00%SOXS
- 0.95%SRTY, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SRTY 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
SOXS 6th cheapest of 14 funds
SOXS vs SRTY Dividends
- SOXS 22.76%, better
- SRTY 5.87%
- SOXS $11.85
- SRTY $1.55
- SOXS $0.44
- SRTY $0.27
- SOXS Sep 22, 2026
- SRTY Sep 23, 2026
- SOXS Sep 29, 2026
- SRTY Sep 29, 2026
- SOXS Quarterly
- SRTY Quarterly
Distribution history
SOXS vs SRTY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SOXS
- SRTY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SOXS 96.2%SRTY 54.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SOXS −1.48SRTY −1.04, better
- Worst fall
- SOXS −100.0%SRTY −92.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SOXS −4.67SRTY −3.24
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.