SDOW ranks 2nd and TECS 7th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SDOW vs TECS
SDOW −0.06pt a year
0.95%1.01%
SDOW 7.9×the volume
3.85M487K
SDOW +23.5pt
−37.6%−61.1%
SDOW vs TECS Performance
−73.1%−98.0%
- SDOW 0.95%, better
- TECS 1.01%
- SDOW $154M
- TECS $72M
- SDOW −21.9%, better
- TECS −57.4%
- SDOW 4.76%
- TECS 6.44%, better
- SDOW 10
- TECS 8
- SDOW 3.85M sh, better
- TECS 487K sh
- SDOW $25.01
- TECS $56.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SDOW | TECS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | C53 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B69Higher | D27 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | F0 | |
| Durability | B67Higher | C46 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SDOW and TECS are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SDOWA
TECSC
In short
SDOW The only -3x ETF pointed at the Dow. SDOW aims to deliver three times the inverse of the index's daily move, reset at each close, for 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
TECS A three-times-daily short on the tech sector, in an ordinary ETF wrapper. TECS aims to deliver -3x the daily move of the Technology Select Sector Index, with no margin account and no borrowed shares involved.
Stated mandate
SDOW SDOW seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to three times the inverse of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
TECS The fund seeks daily investment results corresponding to the inverse of the Technology Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SDOW vs TECS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SDOW vs TECS Cost
Overpaying TECS vs SDOW
$981
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SDOW 0.95%
$17,869
TECS 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SDOW | TECS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,780 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,686 | $364 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $18,850 | $981 |
- 0.95%SDOW, cheaper
- 1.01%TECS
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SDOW 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
TECS 7th cheapest of 14 funds
SDOW vs TECS Dividends
- SDOW 4.76%
- TECS 6.44%, better
- SDOW $1.19
- TECS $4.18
- SDOW $0.29
- TECS $0.50
- SDOW Sep 23, 2026
- TECS Sep 22, 2026
- SDOW Sep 29, 2026
- TECS Sep 29, 2026
- SDOW Quarterly
- TECS Quarterly
Distribution history
SDOW vs TECS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SDOW
- TECS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SDOW 34.4%, betterTECS 59.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- SDOW −1.22, betterTECS −1.41
- Worst fall
- SDOW −85.1%, betterTECS −99.0%
- Market sensitivity
- SDOW −2.46TECS −3.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.