SRTY ranks 3rd and TECS 7th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SRTY vs TECS
0.0%by weight
SRTY −0.06pt a year
0.95%1.01%
SRTY 3.3×the volume
1.6M487K
SRTY +18.3pt
−42.8%−61.1%
SRTY vs TECS Performance
−82.0%−98.0%
- SRTY 0.95%, better
- TECS 1.01%
- SRTY $68M
- TECS $72M
- SRTY −37.4%, better
- TECS −57.4%
- SRTY 5.87%
- TECS 6.44%, better
- SRTY 5
- TECS 8
- SRTY 1.6M sh, better
- TECS 487K sh
- SRTY $26.34
- TECS $56.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SRTY | TECS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | C53 |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | C53Higher | D27 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56Higher | C46 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SRTY and TECS are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SRTYA
TECSC
In short
SRTY A one-day instrument by design: SRTY aims for three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, and it has been the ProShares small-cap bear since 2010.
TECS A three-times-daily short on the tech sector, in an ordinary ETF wrapper. TECS aims to deliver -3x the daily move of the Technology Select Sector Index, with no margin account and no borrowed shares involved.
Stated mandate
SRTY SRTY seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index.
TECS The fund seeks daily investment results corresponding to the inverse of the Technology Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SRTY vs TECS Holdings
How SRTY and TECS differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SRTY and 0.0% of TECS.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TECS.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for TECS.
Concentration
- SRTY100.0%
- TECS167.2%
- SRTY4
- TECS0
Asset class
- SRTY
- Equity
- TECS
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in SRTY4
- In both0
- Only in TECS0
Only in SRTY
4 securities, 94.5% of SRTY by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf61.49%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-2917.54%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-1014.11%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-191.40%
Only in TECS
0 securities, 0.0% of TECS by weight
Weight gaps
SRTY and TECS share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SRTY vs TECS Cost
Overpaying TECS vs SRTY
$981
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SRTY 0.95%
$17,869
TECS 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SRTY | TECS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,780 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,686 | $364 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $18,850 | $981 |
- 0.95%SRTY, cheaper
- 1.01%TECS
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SRTY 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
TECS 7th cheapest of 14 funds
SRTY vs TECS Dividends
- SRTY 5.87%
- TECS 6.44%, better
- SRTY $1.55
- TECS $4.18
- SRTY $0.27
- TECS $0.50
- SRTY Sep 23, 2026
- TECS Sep 22, 2026
- SRTY Sep 29, 2026
- TECS Sep 29, 2026
- SRTY Quarterly
- TECS Quarterly
Distribution history
SRTY vs TECS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SRTY
- TECS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SRTY 54.0%, betterTECS 59.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- SRTY −1.04, betterTECS −1.41
- Worst fall
- SRTY −92.8%, betterTECS −99.0%
- Market sensitivity
- SRTY −3.24TECS −3.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.