SDOW ranks 2nd and WEBS 13th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SDOW vs WEBS
SDOW −0.12pt a year
0.95%1.07%
SDOW 79.4×the volume
3.85M48.5K
SDOW +8.8pt
−23.1%−31.9%
SDOW vs WEBS Performance
−73.1%−85.4%
- SDOW 0.95%, better
- WEBS 1.07%
- SDOW $154M
- WEBS $7M
- SDOW −21.9%
- WEBS +5.6%, better
- SDOW 4.76%, better
- WEBS 3.27%
- SDOW 10
- WEBS 4
- SDOW 3.85M sh, better
- WEBS 48.5K sh
- SDOW $25.01
- WEBS $16.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SDOW | WEBS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | F5 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B69Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | F24 |
| Holdings | F0 | |
| Durability | B67Higher | F19 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SDOW and WEBS are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SDOWA
WEBSF
In short
SDOW The only -3x ETF pointed at the Dow. SDOW aims to deliver three times the inverse of the index's daily move, reset at each close, for 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
WEBS Most triple-inverse ETFs short the whole market. WEBS aims at 3x the inverse of one day's move in a 40-stock Dow Jones internet index, at 1.07% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
SDOW SDOW seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to three times the inverse of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
WEBS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SDOW vs WEBS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SDOW vs WEBS Cost
Overpaying WEBS vs SDOW
$1,946
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SDOW 0.95%
$17,869
WEBS 1.07%
$19,815
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SDOW | WEBS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,881 | $203 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $7,046 | $724 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $19,815 | $1,946 |
- 0.95%SDOW, cheaper
- 1.07%WEBS
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SDOW 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
WEBS 13th cheapest of 14 funds
SDOW vs WEBS Dividends
- SDOW 4.76%, better
- WEBS 3.27%
- SDOW $1.19
- WEBS $0.58
- SDOW $0.29
- WEBS $0.19
- SDOW Sep 23, 2026
- WEBS Sep 22, 2026
- SDOW Sep 29, 2026
- WEBS Sep 29, 2026
- SDOW Quarterly
- WEBS Quarterly
Distribution history
SDOW vs WEBS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SDOW
- WEBS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SDOW 34.4%, betterWEBS 57.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SDOW −1.22WEBS −0.95, better
- Worst fall
- SDOW −85.1%, betterWEBS −97.5%
- Market sensitivity
- SDOW −2.46WEBS −3.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.