SQQQ ranks 1st and WEBS 13th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SQQQ vs WEBS
0.0%by weight
SQQQ −0.13pt a year
0.94%1.07%
SQQQ 1030.3×the volume
50M48.5K
WEBS +10.6pt
−42.5%−31.9%
SQQQ vs WEBS Performance
−93.7%−85.4%
- SQQQ 0.94%, better
- WEBS 1.07%
- SQQQ $2.04B
- WEBS $7M
- SQQQ −32.5%
- WEBS +5.6%, better
- SQQQ 7.78%, better
- WEBS 3.27%
- SQQQ 12
- WEBS 4
- SQQQ 50M sh, better
- WEBS 48.5K sh
- SQQQ $41.85
- WEBS $16.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SQQQ | WEBS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F5 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | C47 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | A92Higher | F24 |
| Holdings | C47 | |
| Durability | A73Higher | F19 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SQQQ and WEBS are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SQQQA
WEBSF
In short
SQQQ The workhorse of the short-Nasdaq trade. Running since 2010, it aims at three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100's daily move, resets every session, and charges 0.94% a year, below the going rate in the 3x bear category.
WEBS Most triple-inverse ETFs short the whole market. WEBS aims at 3x the inverse of one day's move in a 40-stock Dow Jones internet index, at 1.07% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
SQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100 Index’s daily performance.
WEBS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SQQQ vs WEBS Holdings
How SQQQ and WEBS differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SQQQ and 0.0% of WEBS.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for WEBS.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for WEBS.
Concentration
- SQQQ125.7%
- WEBS151.2%
- SQQQ12
- WEBS0
Asset class
- SQQQ
- Equity
- WEBS
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in SQQQ12
- In both0
- Only in WEBS0
Only in SQQQ
12 securities, 100% of SQQQ by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf51.28%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-0315.84%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-1211.52%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-0110.06%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-039.08%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-248.36%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-296.52%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-195.50%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-263.75%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-02-113.74%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-103.28%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2027-01-071.25%
Only in WEBS
0 securities, 0.0% of WEBS by weight
Weight gaps
SQQQ and WEBS share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SQQQ vs WEBS Cost
Overpaying WEBS vs SQQQ
$2,111
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SQQQ 0.94%
$17,704
WEBS 1.07%
$19,815
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SQQQ | WEBS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,661 | $1,881 | $220 |
| 20 | $6,260 | $7,046 | $786 |
| 30 | $17,704 | $19,815 | $2,111 |
- 0.94%SQQQ, cheaper
- 1.07%WEBS
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SQQQ cheapest of 14 funds
WEBS 13th cheapest of 14 funds
SQQQ vs WEBS Dividends
- SQQQ 7.78%, better
- WEBS 3.27%
- SQQQ $3.25
- WEBS $0.58
- SQQQ $0.47
- WEBS $0.19
- SQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- WEBS Sep 22, 2026
- SQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- WEBS Sep 29, 2026
- SQQQ Quarterly
- WEBS Quarterly
Distribution history
SQQQ vs WEBS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SQQQ
- WEBS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SQQQ 48.2%, betterWEBS 57.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SQQQ −1.42WEBS −0.95, better
- Worst fall
- SQQQ −97.5%WEBS −97.5%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- SQQQ −3.43WEBS −3.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.