SRTY ranks 3rd and WEBS 13th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SRTY vs WEBS
SRTY −0.12pt a year
0.95%1.07%
SRTY 33.1×the volume
1.6M48.5K
SRTY +2.9pt
−29.0%−31.9%
SRTY vs WEBS Performance
−82.0%−85.4%
- SRTY 0.95%, better
- WEBS 1.07%
- SRTY $68M
- WEBS $7M
- SRTY −37.4%
- WEBS +5.6%, better
- SRTY 5.87%, better
- WEBS 3.27%
- SRTY 5
- WEBS 4
- SRTY 1.6M sh, better
- WEBS 48.5K sh
- SRTY $26.34
- WEBS $16.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SRTY | WEBS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | F5 |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | C53 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | A70Higher | F24 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56Higher | F19 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SRTY and WEBS are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SRTYA
WEBSF
In short
SRTY A one-day instrument by design: SRTY aims for three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, and it has been the ProShares small-cap bear since 2010.
WEBS Most triple-inverse ETFs short the whole market. WEBS aims at 3x the inverse of one day's move in a 40-stock Dow Jones internet index, at 1.07% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
SRTY SRTY seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index.
WEBS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SRTY vs WEBS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SRTY vs WEBS Cost
Overpaying WEBS vs SRTY
$1,946
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SRTY 0.95%
$17,869
WEBS 1.07%
$19,815
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SRTY | WEBS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,881 | $203 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $7,046 | $724 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $19,815 | $1,946 |
- 0.95%SRTY, cheaper
- 1.07%WEBS
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SRTY 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
WEBS 13th cheapest of 14 funds
SRTY vs WEBS Dividends
- SRTY 5.87%, better
- WEBS 3.27%
- SRTY $1.55
- WEBS $0.58
- SRTY $0.27
- WEBS $0.19
- SRTY Sep 23, 2026
- WEBS Sep 22, 2026
- SRTY Sep 29, 2026
- WEBS Sep 29, 2026
- SRTY Quarterly
- WEBS Quarterly
Distribution history
SRTY vs WEBS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SRTY
- WEBS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SRTY 54.0%, betterWEBS 57.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SRTY −1.04WEBS −0.95, better
- Worst fall
- SRTY −92.8%, betterWEBS −97.5%
- Market sensitivity
- SRTY −3.24WEBS −3.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.