SDOW ranks 2nd and YANG 8th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SDOW vs YANG
SDOW −0.08pt a year
0.95%1.03%
SDOW 5.7×the volume
3.85M676K
YANG +2.5pt
−37.6%−35.1%
SDOW vs YANG Performance
−73.1%−88.1%
- SDOW 0.95%, better
- YANG 1.03%
- SDOW $154M
- YANG $83M
- SDOW −21.9%
- YANG +53.4%, better
- SDOW 4.76%, better
- YANG 2.83%
- SDOW 10
- YANG 4
- SDOW 3.85M sh, better
- YANG 676K sh
- SDOW $25.01
- YANG $36.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SDOW | YANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | C42 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B69 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | A81Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | F0 | |
| Durability | B67Higher | C53 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SDOW and YANG are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SDOWA
YANGC
In short
SDOW The only -3x ETF pointed at the Dow. SDOW aims to deliver three times the inverse of the index's daily move, reset at each close, for 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
YANG The blunt instrument for a rough day in Chinese equities. YANG aims for -300% of the FTSE China 50's daily move, resets every night, and has been running that playbook since 2009. Built for a day, not a decade.
Stated mandate
SDOW SDOW seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to three times the inverse of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
YANG The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to -300% of the FTSE China 50 Index. Its objective applies to a single day and is not intended to provide negative three-times cumulative performance over longer periods.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SDOW vs YANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SDOW vs YANG Cost
Overpaying YANG vs SDOW
$1,304
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SDOW 0.95%
$17,869
YANG 1.03%
$19,173
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SDOW | YANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,814 | $136 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,807 | $485 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $19,173 | $1,304 |
- 0.95%SDOW, cheaper
- 1.03%YANG
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SDOW 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
YANG 8th cheapest of 14 funds
SDOW vs YANG Dividends
- SDOW 4.76%, better
- YANG 2.83%
- SDOW $1.19
- YANG $0.98
- SDOW $0.29
- YANG $0.27
- SDOW Sep 23, 2026
- YANG Sep 22, 2026
- SDOW Sep 29, 2026
- YANG Sep 29, 2026
- SDOW Quarterly
- YANG Quarterly
Distribution history
SDOW vs YANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SDOW
- YANG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SDOW 34.4%, betterYANG 58.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SDOW −1.22YANG −0.77, better
- Worst fall
- SDOW −85.1%, betterYANG −97.4%
- Market sensitivity
- SDOW −2.46YANG −0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.