SRTY ranks 3rd and YANG 8th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SRTY vs YANG
SRTY −0.08pt a year
0.95%1.03%
SRTY 2.4×the volume
1.6M676K
YANG +7.7pt
−42.8%−35.1%
SRTY vs YANG Performance
−82.0%−88.1%
- SRTY 0.95%, better
- YANG 1.03%
- SRTY $68M
- YANG $83M
- SRTY −37.4%
- YANG +53.4%, better
- SRTY 5.87%, better
- YANG 2.83%
- SRTY 5
- YANG 4
- SRTY 1.6M sh, better
- YANG 676K sh
- SRTY $26.34
- YANG $36.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SRTY | YANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | C42 |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | C53 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | A70Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56Higher | C53 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SRTY and YANG are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SRTYA
YANGC
In short
SRTY A one-day instrument by design: SRTY aims for three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, and it has been the ProShares small-cap bear since 2010.
YANG The blunt instrument for a rough day in Chinese equities. YANG aims for -300% of the FTSE China 50's daily move, resets every night, and has been running that playbook since 2009. Built for a day, not a decade.
Stated mandate
SRTY SRTY seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index.
YANG The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to -300% of the FTSE China 50 Index. Its objective applies to a single day and is not intended to provide negative three-times cumulative performance over longer periods.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SRTY vs YANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SRTY vs YANG Cost
Overpaying YANG vs SRTY
$1,304
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SRTY 0.95%
$17,869
YANG 1.03%
$19,173
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SRTY | YANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,814 | $136 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,807 | $485 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $19,173 | $1,304 |
- 0.95%SRTY, cheaper
- 1.03%YANG
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SRTY 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
YANG 8th cheapest of 14 funds
SRTY vs YANG Dividends
- SRTY 5.87%, better
- YANG 2.83%
- SRTY $1.55
- YANG $0.98
- SRTY $0.27
- YANG $0.27
- SRTY Sep 23, 2026
- YANG Sep 22, 2026
- SRTY Sep 29, 2026
- YANG Sep 29, 2026
- SRTY Quarterly
- YANG Quarterly
Distribution history
SRTY vs YANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SRTY
- YANG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SRTY 54.0%, betterYANG 58.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SRTY −1.04YANG −0.77, better
- Worst fall
- SRTY −92.8%, betterYANG −97.4%
- Market sensitivity
- SRTY −3.24YANG −0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.