Skip to content

TZA vs YANG

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETF

TZABNYSE Arca

Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF

YANGCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

TZA −0.04pt a year

TZA0.99%YANG1.03%

Avg volume · 30D

TZA 26.4×the volume

TZA17.8MYANG676K

10Y return · a year

YANG +6.7pt

TZA−41.8%YANG−35.1%

TZA vs YANG Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−79.9%TZA−88.1%YANG

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. TZA −79.9%. YANG −88.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%0%50%100%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
TZA 0.99%, better
YANG 1.03%
Fund size
TZA $191M
YANG $83M
1Y total return
TZA −37.2%
YANG +53.4%, better
Yield (12M)
TZA 4.06%, better
YANG 2.83%
Holdings
TZA 7
YANG 4
Avg volume (30D)
TZA 17.8M sh, better
YANG 676K sh
NAV per share
TZA $44.49
YANG $36.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

TZA: Cost 64, Risk 54, Mission 75, Tradability 63, Holdings not scored, Durability 60. YANG: Cost 42, Risk 70, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings not scored, Durability 53.
Pillar letters and Scores for TZA, YANG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarTZAYANG
Cost30% weightB64HigherC42
Mission25% weightA75Not scored
Risk15% weightC54A70Higher
Tradability15% weightB63HigherD27
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB60HigherC53

Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. TZA and YANG are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

3x Leveraged Inverse⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

TZA ranks 4th and YANG 8th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.

  1. Rank 1ASQQQProShares UltraPro Short QQQScore 83
  2. Rank 2ASDOWProShares UltraPro Short Dow30Score 78
  3. Rank 3ASRTYProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000Score 71
  4. Rank 4BTZADirexion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 5BSOXSDirexion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 7CTECSDirexion Daily Technology Bear 3X ETFScore 46
  7. Rank 8CYANGDirexion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETFScore 45
  8. Rank 9CSMDDProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400Score 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

TZABDirexion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETF

YANGCDirexion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF

In short

TZA Born in the wreckage of 2008, TZA aims to move three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily swing. A heavily traded way to press a bearish small-cap view, with a daily reset that makes it a tool for days, not quarters.

YANG The blunt instrument for a rough day in Chinese equities. YANG aims for -300% of the FTSE China 50's daily move, resets every night, and has been running that playbook since 2009. Built for a day, not a decade.

Stated mandate

TZA The Fund seeks daily inverse leveraged investment results equal to negative three times the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index. Its leverage makes it potentially riskier than nonleveraged alternatives.

YANG The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to -300% of the FTSE China 50 Index. Its objective applies to a single day and is not intended to provide negative three-times cumulative performance over longer periods.

Why people hold it

  • TZA Fee of 0.99% comes in under the typical leveraged bear fund, and under every other Russell 2000 short ETF on the shelf (RWM, TWM, SRTY).
  • Very actively traded, which usually means tight spreads and easy exits when a short-term view changes fast.
  • Running since 2008, a long life for a leveraged fund, and it has stayed close to its stated daily target.
  • Sits in the upper half of a crowded leveraged bear peer group on our overall read.
  • YANG Costs 1.03% a year, below the typical leveraged bear fund and well under the other US funds shorting this same index (FXP at 1.79%, YXI at 2.65%).
  • Aims for -300% of the index's daily move, so expressing a bearish view ties up a fraction of the capital an unleveraged short position would.
  • Short exposure in a plain brokerage account: no margin agreement, no locating shares to borrow, no losses beyond the amount invested.direxion.com
  • Launched in December 2009 and actively traded since, making it one of the more established ways to short large Hong Kong-listed Chinese names.direxion.com

Worth knowing

  • TZA The -3x target resets every day. Hold longer and compounding pulls results away from three times the index move over that stretch, up or down.
  • Triple leverage cuts both ways: a 1% up day in the Russell 2000 is roughly a 3% down day here, before costs.
  • Direxion's own filing flags the fund as potentially riskier than nonleveraged alternatives and built for daily monitoring.
  • YANG The -3x objective applies to one day only. Hold longer and the nightly reset makes results path-dependent, especially in choppy markets.
  • Leverage cuts both ways: an up day in the FTSE China 50 hits roughly three times as hard here.
  • That 1.03% fee is cheap for this corner of the market but many times a plain index fund's, and it accrues daily whether the trade works or not.

Full TZA profile⁠

Full YANG profile⁠

TZA vs YANG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

TZA vs YANG Cost

Overpaying YANG vs TZA

$648

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • TZA 0.99%

    $18,525

  • YANG 1.03%

    $19,173

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • TZA 0.99%
  • YANG 1.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530YANG $19,173TZA $18,525

Year by year

YearTZAYANGOverpaying
10$1,746$1,814$68
20$6,565$6,807$242
30$18,525$19,173$648

Expense ratio

  • 0.99%TZA, cheaper
  • 1.03%YANG
  • Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
  • Median 1.02%

TZA 5th cheapest of 14 funds

YANG 8th cheapest of 14 funds

TZA vs YANG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
TZA 4.06%, better
YANG 2.83%
Payout (12M)
TZA $1.90
YANG $0.98
Last payment
TZA $0.47
YANG $0.27
Ex-dividend
TZA Sep 22, 2026
YANG Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
TZA Sep 29, 2026
YANG Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
TZA Quarterly
YANG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

TZAQuarterly · 21 paymentsAll TZA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 21 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2018 $6.00; Sep 25, 2018 $12.00; Dec 27, 2018 $20.23; Mar 19, 2019 $2.16; Sep 24, 2019 $26.07; Dec 23, 2019 $7.17; Mar 21, 2023 $4.60; Jun 21, 2023 $2.36; Sep 19, 2023 $2.88; Dec 21, 2023 $1.11; Mar 19, 2024 $2.36; Jun 25, 2024 $2.33; Sep 24, 2024 $1.47; Dec 23, 2024 $0.84; Mar 25, 2025 $2.38; Jun 24, 2025 $0.56; Sep 23, 2025 $0.53; Dec 23, 2025 $0.34; Mar 24, 2026 $0.71; Jun 23, 2026 $0.38; Sep 22, 2026 $0.47. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$25202020232026YTD
YANGQuarterly · 23 paymentsAll YANG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2018 $1.05; Sep 25, 2018 $2.28; Dec 27, 2018 $4.19; Mar 19, 2019 $2.91; Jun 25, 2019 $3.80; Sep 24, 2019 $3.39; Dec 23, 2019 $1.91; Mar 24, 2020 $0.01; Mar 21, 2023 $3.17; Jun 21, 2023 $1.59; Sep 19, 2023 $1.80; Dec 21, 2023 $2.81; Mar 19, 2024 $1.91; Jun 25, 2024 $2.32; Sep 24, 2024 $1.63; Dec 23, 2024 $0.74; Mar 25, 2025 $0.26; Jun 24, 2025 $0.27; Sep 23, 2025 $0.21; Dec 23, 2025 $0.29; Mar 24, 2026 $0.26; Jun 23, 2026 $0.16; Sep 22, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$25202020232026YTD

TZA vs YANG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • TZA
  • YANG
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: YANG −97.4% · Oct 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−100%−75%−50%−25%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
TZA 53.9%, betterYANG 58.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
TZA −1.01YANG −0.77, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
TZA −92.1%, betterYANG −97.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
TZA −3.25YANG −0.96

Popular comparisons

  • TZABvsSQQQA

    Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETF · ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.94%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YANGCvsSQQQA

    Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF · ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

    Expense ratio
    1.03% · 0.94%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TZABvsSDOWA

    Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETF · ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YANGCvsSDOWA

    Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF · ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

    Expense ratio
    1.03% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TZABvsSRTYA

    Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X ETF · ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000

    Expense ratio
    0.99% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • YANGCvsSRTYA

    Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF · ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000

    Expense ratio
    1.03% · 0.95%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.