SGDM ranks 2nd and SILJ 13th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
SGDM vs SILJ
SGDM −0.23pt a year
0.46%0.69%
SILJ 101.7×the volume
36.1K3.67M
SGDM +6.0pt
+12.3%+6.3%
SGDM vs SILJ Performance
+156.6%+87.3%
- SGDM 0.46%, better
- SILJ 0.69%
- SGDM $568M
- SILJ $2.91B
- SGDM +12.4%, better
- SILJ +1.5%
- SGDM 1.12%
- SILJ 2.46%, better
- SGDM 49
- SILJ 67
- SGDM 36.1K sh
- SILJ 3.67M sh, better
- SGDM $64.96
- SILJ $22.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SGDM | SILJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | F12 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | B56 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | A70Higher | B60 |
| Durability | B60 | A78Higher |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. SGDM and SILJ are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SGDMB
SILJC
In short
SGDM SGDM doesn't just rank gold miners by size. It tracks a custom-factors index of roughly 50 larger miners listed in Canada and the US, and charges 0.46%, under its peer group's median fee.
SILJ The original junior-silver play. Since 2012 SILJ has done one job: passively track an index of roughly 70 small silver miners, producers and explorers, the high-octane end of a niche most metals funds cover with gold.
Stated mandate
SGDM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, which targets larger gold companies listed on Canadian and major U.S. exchanges.
SILJ The Fund is a passively managed ETF seeking results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to an index focused on companies engaged in silver mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SGDM vs SILJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SGDM vs SILJ Cost
Overpaying SILJ vs SGDM
$4,199
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SGDM 0.46%
$9,230
SILJ 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SGDM | SILJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $830 | $1,232 | $402 |
| 20 | $3,195 | $4,697 | $1,502 |
| 30 | $9,230 | $13,429 | $4,199 |
- 0.46%SGDM, cheaper
- 0.69%SILJ
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
SGDM 7th cheapest of 18 funds
SILJ 16th cheapest of 18 funds
SGDM vs SILJ Dividends
- SGDM 1.12%
- SILJ 2.46%, better
- SGDM $0.73
- SILJ $0.55
- SGDM $0.73
- SILJ $0.55
- SGDM Dec 18, 2025
- SILJ Dec 29, 2025
- SGDM Dec 22, 2025
- SILJ Dec 30, 2025
- SGDM Annual
- SILJ Annual
Distribution history
SGDM vs SILJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SGDM
- SILJ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SGDM 40.0%, betterSILJ 49.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- SGDM 0.97, betterSILJ 0.88
- Worst fall
- SGDM −45.0%, betterSILJ −48.3%
- Market sensitivity
- SGDM 0.71SILJ 1.28
SGDM and SILJ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

