GDX ranks 3rd and SILJ 13th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
GDX vs SILJ
GDX −0.18pt a year
0.51%0.69%
GDX 5.8×the volume
21.2M3.67M
GDX +6.9pt
+13.2%+6.3%
GDX vs SILJ Performance
+160.5%+87.3%
- GDX 0.51%, better
- SILJ 0.69%
- GDX $23.8B
- SILJ $2.91B
- GDX +7.7%, better
- SILJ +1.5%
- GDX 0.82%
- SILJ 2.46%, better
- GDX 61
- SILJ 67
- GDX 21.2M sh, better
- SILJ 3.67M sh
- GDX $77.30
- SILJ $22.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDX | SILJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50Higher | F12 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | D30 |
| Tradability | A95Higher | A93 |
| Holdings | B57 | B60Higher |
| Durability | A88Higher | A78 |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. GDX and SILJ are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDXB
SILJC
In short
GDX The original gold miner ETF, running since 2006. Roughly 60 mining companies in one ticker, for people who want equity exposure to gold's economics rather than a bar in a vault.
SILJ The original junior-silver play. Since 2012 SILJ has done one job: passively track an index of roughly 70 small silver miners, producers and explorers, the high-octane end of a niche most metals funds cover with gold.
Stated mandate
GDX GDX seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, which is designed to represent companies involved in gold mining.
SILJ The Fund is a passively managed ETF seeking results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to an index focused on companies engaged in silver mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDX vs SILJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDX vs SILJ Cost
Overpaying SILJ vs GDX
$3,264
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDX 0.51%
$10,165
SILJ 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDX | SILJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $918 | $1,232 | $314 |
| 20 | $3,527 | $4,697 | $1,170 |
| 30 | $10,165 | $13,429 | $3,264 |
- 0.51%GDX, cheaper
- 0.69%SILJ
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
GDX 9th cheapest of 18 funds
SILJ 16th cheapest of 18 funds
GDX vs SILJ Dividends
- GDX 0.82%
- SILJ 2.46%, better
- GDX $0.63
- SILJ $0.55
- GDX $0.63
- SILJ $0.55
- GDX Dec 22, 2025
- SILJ Dec 29, 2025
- GDX Dec 26, 2025
- SILJ Dec 30, 2025
- GDX Annual
- SILJ Annual
Distribution history
GDX vs SILJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GDX
- SILJ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDX 41.4%, betterSILJ 49.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GDX 0.94, betterSILJ 0.88
- Worst fall
- GDX −46.5%, betterSILJ −48.3%
- Market sensitivity
- GDX 0.81SILJ 1.28
GDX and SILJ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.51% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





