SGDM ranks 2nd and SLVP 3rd of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
SGDM vs SLVP
SLVP −0.07pt a year
0.46%0.39%
SLVP 7.0×the volume
36.1K253K
SGDM +2.2pt
+12.3%+10.1%
SGDM vs SLVP Performance
+156.6%+123.1%
- SGDM 0.46%
- SLVP 0.39%, better
- SGDM $568M
- SLVP $730M
- SGDM +12.4%, better
- SLVP +11.4%
- SGDM 1.12%
- SLVP 2.43%, better
- SGDM 49
- SLVP 47
- SGDM 36.1K sh
- SLVP 253K sh, better
- SGDM $64.96
- SLVP $28.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SGDM | SLVP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A79Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | B56 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | A70Higher | F21 |
| Durability | B60 | A79Higher |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. SGDM and SLVP are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SGDMB
SLVPB
In short
SGDM SGDM doesn't just rank gold miners by size. It tracks a custom-factors index of roughly 50 larger miners listed in Canada and the US, and charges 0.46%, under its peer group's median fee.
SLVP About 40 global silver and metals miners in one ticker, priced below the typical precious-metals miner fund. Running since 2012, and read the 'metals miners' part of the name: the index reaches past pure silver plays.
Stated mandate
SGDM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, which targets larger gold companies listed on Canadian and major U.S. exchanges.
SLVP The fund is designed to follow an index of worldwide companies whose principal business is silver exploration or metals mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SGDM vs SLVP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SGDM vs SLVP Cost
Overpaying SGDM vs SLVP
$1,332
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SGDM 0.46%
$9,230
SLVP 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SGDM | SLVP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $830 | $705 | $125 |
| 20 | $3,195 | $2,725 | $470 |
| 30 | $9,230 | $7,898 | $1,332 |
- 0.46%SGDM
- 0.39%SLVP, cheaper
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
SLVP 4th cheapest of 18 funds
SGDM 7th cheapest of 18 funds
SGDM vs SLVP Dividends
- SGDM 1.12%
- SLVP 2.43%, better
- SGDM $0.73
- SLVP $0.70
- SGDM $0.73
- SLVP $0.14
- SGDM Dec 18, 2025
- SLVP Jun 15, 2026
- SGDM Dec 22, 2025
- SLVP Jun 18, 2026
- SGDM Annual
- SLVP Twice a year
Distribution history
SGDM vs SLVP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SGDM
- SLVP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SGDM 40.0%, betterSLVP 49.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- SGDM 0.97SLVP 1.00, better
- Worst fall
- SGDM −45.0%, betterSLVP −47.7%
- Market sensitivity
- SGDM 0.71SLVP 1.21
SGDM and SLVP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.46% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.46% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


