Skip to content

AUMI vs SLVP

Themes Gold Miners ETF

AUMIBNasdaq

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

SLVPBCboe

Overlap

11.0%by weight

Expense ratio

AUMI −0.04pt a year

AUMI0.35%SLVP0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

SLVP 105.1×the volume

AUMI2.4KSLVP253K

AUMI vs SLVP Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.1%AUMI+11.4%SLVP

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AUMI +6.1%. SLVP +11.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.40%60%80%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUMI 0.35%, better
SLVP 0.39%
Fund size
AUMI $19M
SLVP $730M
1Y total return
AUMI +6.1%
SLVP +11.4%, better
Yield (12M)
AUMI 0.98%
SLVP 2.43%, better
Holdings
AUMI 34
SLVP 47
Avg volume (30D)
AUMI 2.4K sh
SLVP 253K sh, better
NAV per share
AUMI $81.97
SLVP $28.98
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUMI: Cost 94, Risk 48, Mission 76, Tradability 15, Holdings 78, Durability 22. SLVP: Cost 79, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 75, Holdings 21, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUMI, SLVP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUMISLVP
Cost30% weightA94HigherA79
Mission25% weightA76Not scored
Risk15% weightC48C53Higher
Tradability15% weightF15A75Higher
Holdings10% weightA78HigherF21
Durability5% weightF22A79Higher

Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUMI and SLVP are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Precious Metals Miners⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

SLVP ranks 3rd and AUMI 5th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.

  1. Rank 1BRINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BSGDMSprott Gold Miners ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BGDXVanEck Gold Miners ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 3BSLVPiShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BAGMIThemes Silver Miners ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 5BAUMIThemes Gold Miners ETFScore 62
  7. Rank 7BAUAUGlobal X Gold Miners ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUMIBThemes Gold Miners ETF

SLVPBiShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

In short

AUMI Gold miners with the blends stripped out. AUMI tracks an index of roughly 30 large miners that must earn at least 90% of revenue from gold, and it charges less than the typical fund in its group.

SLVP About 40 global silver and metals miners in one ticker, priced below the typical precious-metals miner fund. Running since 2012, and read the 'metals miners' part of the name: the index reaches past pure silver plays.

Stated mandate

AUMI The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of companies active in the gold mining industry. It uses a passive/indexing approach to pursue that objective.

SLVP The fund is designed to follow an index of worldwide companies whose principal business is silver exploration or metals mining.

Why people hold it

  • AUMI The "pure" in the index name is a rule: members must generate at least 90% of revenue from gold mining, so copper-and-gold conglomerates and diversified diggers stay out.solactive.comthemesetfs.com
  • A 0.35% fee undercuts the peer-group median and the category's household names, VanEck's GDX (0.51%) and iShares' RING (0.39%).
  • Roughly 30 names, free-float weighted, rebuilt on a set schedule: a concentrated, rules-based way to own the diggers rather than the metal.solactive.com
  • SLVP 0.39% a year undercuts the 0.52% median for precious-metals miner funds, and matches the fee on the iShares gold-miner sibling, RING.
  • Global mandate, not a US-listing screen: the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners IMI covers worldwide companies whose principal business is silver exploration or metals mining.
  • Trading since 2012, one of the longer-running silver miner funds on the shelf, and it stands among the stronger implementations in its precious-metals mining peer group.

Worth knowing

  • AUMI Thinly traded and small next to the group's giants, so bid-ask spreads can be wider and big orders can push the price.
  • Concentrated by design and non-diversified: about 30 miners, one commodity, plus mine-level risks like costs, permits and politics.themesetfs.com
  • Launched in December 2023, so the live track record is short, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than monthly.
  • SLVP Roughly 40 stocks, so individual miners carry real weight and the whole basket keys off one metal's fortunes.
  • "And Metals Miners" is doing work in the name: the mandate covers silver exploration or metals mining, so diversified miners can sit beside pure silver plays.
  • Not the cheapest silver miner ticket: AGMI lists at 0.35%, though it lacks SLVP's record back to 2012.

Full AUMI profile⁠

Full SLVP profile⁠

AUMI vs SLVP Holdings

How AUMI and SLVP differ

Overlap by weight

11.0%

Shared holdings make up 22.5% of AUMI and 11.1% of SLVP.

Level by level

  • Sector3 Sectors0.0%
  • Holdings6 in both11.0%
  • Countryby domicile66.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in AUMI and SLVP, widest gap first
SectorMore in AUMIMore in SLVP
Metals & MiningSLVP +100.0 points
MaterialsAUMI +100.0 points
CommunicationSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AUMI and SLVP, widest gap first
CountryMore in AUMIMore in SLVP
AustraliaAUMI +27.9 points
United StatesSLVP +17.2 points
MexicoSLVP +11.2 points
South AfricaAUMI +5.3 points
United KingdomSLVP +3.7 points
CanadaSLVP +1.8 points
ChinaAUMI +0.6 points

Outside the US: AUMI 91% developed, 9% emerging. SLVP 82% developed, 18% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • AUMI46.5%
  • SLVP72.3%

Securities held

  • AUMI34
  • SLVP36

Asset class

AUMI
Equity
SLVP
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in AUMI28
  • In both6
  • Only in SLVP30

Only in AUMI

28 securities, 77.5% of AUMI by weight

  • Northern Star Resources Ltd6.39%
  • Endeavour Mining PLC4.82%
  • Alamos Gold Inc4.52%

Only in SLVP

30 securities, 88.7% of SLVP by weight

  • Hecla Mining13.81%
  • Indust Penoles11.39%
  • First Majestic Silver10.25%

Weight gaps

All 6 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in AUMI and SLVP, widest gap first
HoldingMore in AUMIMore in SLVP
DPM Metals IncAUMI +3.15 points
Lundin Gold IncAUMI +3.02 points
Torex Gold Resources IncAUMI +2.32 points
Zhaojin Mining Industry Co LtdAUMI +1.59 points
Kinross Gold CorpAUMI +1.40 points
Agnico Eagle Mines LtdSLVP +0.10 points

All 30 AUMI holdings⁠All 36 SLVP holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUMI vs SLVP Cost

Overpaying SLVP vs AUMI

$772

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUMI 0.35%

    $7,126

  • SLVP 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUMI 0.35%
  • SLVP 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530SLVP $7,898AUMI $7,126

Year by year

YearAUMISLVPOverpaying
10$634$705$71
20$2,454$2,725$271
30$7,126$7,898$772

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%AUMI, cheaper
  • 0.39%SLVP
  • Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
  • Median 0.52%

AUMI cheapest of 18 funds

SLVP 4th cheapest of 18 funds

AUMI vs SLVP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AUMI 0.98%
SLVP 2.43%, better
Payout (12M)
AUMI $0.80
SLVP $0.70
Last payment
AUMI $0.80
SLVP $0.14
Ex-dividend
AUMI Dec 18, 2025
SLVP Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
AUMI Dec 19, 2025
SLVP Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
AUMI Irregular
SLVP Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AUMIIrregular · 2 paymentsAll AUMI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2024 $0.65; Dec 18, 2025 $0.80. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
SLVPTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll SLVP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.06; Dec 19, 2017 $0.03; Jun 19, 2018 $0.06; Dec 18, 2018 $0.05; Jun 17, 2019 $0.04; Dec 16, 2019 $0.19; Jun 15, 2020 $0.02; Dec 14, 2020 $0.39; Jun 10, 2021 $0.15; Dec 13, 2021 $0.06; Jun 9, 2022 $0.06; Dec 13, 2022 $0.0096; Jun 7, 2023 $0.04; Dec 20, 2023 $0.05; Jun 11, 2024 $0.04; Dec 17, 2024 $0.08; Jun 16, 2025 $0.04; Dec 16, 2025 $0.57; Jun 15, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

AUMI vs SLVP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUMI 43.7%since Jan 2024SLVP 49.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUMI 1.01since Jan 2024SLVP 1.00
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUMI −39.8%since Dec 2023SLVP −47.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUMI 0.05SLVP 1.21

AUMI and SLVP in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AUMIBvsRINGB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVPBvsRINGB

    iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUMIBvsSGDMB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVPBvsSGDMB

    iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUMIBvsGDXB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVPBvsGDXB

    iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.