VB ranks 2nd and SMMD 5th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
SMMD vs VB
VB −0.12pt a year
0.15%0.03%
VB 1.5×the volume
324K499K
SMMD +0.3pt
+6.7%+6.4%
SMMD vs VB Performance
+38.3%+36.2%
- SMMD 0.15%
- VB 0.03%, better
- SMMD $4.18B
- VB $176B
- SMMD +18.1%, better
- VB +15.3%
- SMMD 1.15%
- VB 1.26%, better
- SMMD 2484
- VB 1305
- SMMD 324K sh
- VB 499K sh, better
- SMMD $86.44
- VB $290.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SMMD | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B56 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A86 |
| Risk | B60 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | B57Higher |
| Holdings | A80Higher | B59 |
| Durability | B58 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. SMMD and VB are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SMMDA
VBA
In short
SMMD Most small-cap funds stop at the Russell 2000. SMMD keeps going, tracking the Russell 2500: that index plus the 500 smallest mid-caps from the Russell 1000. The whole small-to-mid band in one ticker.
VB Vanguard's small-cap workhorse: roughly 1,400 smaller US companies for three basis points. The CRSP index behind it shifts stocks between size bands in two half steps instead of one jump, which holds turnover down. Trading since 2004.
Stated mandate
SMMD The fund tracks the Russell 2500 Index, an index representing small- to mid-capitalization U.S. equities.
VB The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Small Cap Index, which measures the investment performance of small U.S. companies. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the index by holding its securities in approximately their index weights.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SMMD vs VB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SMMD vs VB Cost
Overpaying SMMD vs VB
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SMMD 0.15%
$3,137
VB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SMMD | VB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $55 | $219 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $216 | $855 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $638 | $2,499 |
- 0.15%SMMD
- 0.03%VB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VB cheapest of 16 funds
SMMD 7th cheapest of 16 funds
SMMD vs VB Dividends
- SMMD 1.15%
- VB 1.26%, better
- SMMD $1.00
- VB $3.65
- SMMD $0.28
- VB $0.85
- SMMD Sep 15, 2026
- VB Sep 28, 2026
- SMMD Sep 18, 2026
- VB Sep 30, 2026
- SMMD Quarterly
- VB Quarterly
Distribution history
SMMD vs VB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SMMD
- VB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SMMD 17.1%VB 16.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SMMD 0.93, betterVB 0.89
- Worst fall
- SMMD −28.2%VB −28.2%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- SMMD 1.09VB 1.07
SMMD and VB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



