VTES ranks 1st and SMMU 18th of 27 funds in the Short-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
SMMU vs VTES
VTES −0.30pt a year
0.35%0.05%
VTES 3.0×the volume
165K498K
SMMU +0.4pt
+4.0%+3.6%
SMMU vs VTES Performance
+2.5%+1.6%
- SMMU 0.35%
- VTES 0.05%, better
- SMMU $1.2B
- VTES $3.6B
- SMMU +2.5%, better
- VTES +1.6%
- SMMU 2.86%, better
- VTES 2.67%
- SMMU 381
- VTES 3913
- SMMU 165K sh
- VTES 498K sh, better
- SMMU $50.24
- VTES $100.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SMMU | VTES |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B58Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | A74 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | B63 |
| Durability | A75 | A83Higher |
Rank among Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. SMMU and VTES are both graded against the same 27 Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SMMUB
VTESA
In short
SMMU PIMCO's muni desk running short-maturity bonds in an ETF wrapper since 2010. No index to hug: about 300 positions picked by hand, with interest intended to come out exempt from federal income tax and cash paid monthly.
VTES Vanguard's muni ETF on a short leash: an AMT-free tax-exempt index, but capped at seven years to trim interest-rate sensitivity. Five basis points, roughly 2,700 bonds, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
SMMU The Fund seeks maximum total return while preserving capital through prudent investment practices.
VTES The Fund seeks to track an index representing investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds with remaining maturities from one month through seven years.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SMMU vs VTES Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SMMU vs VTES Cost
Overpaying SMMU vs VTES
$6,066
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SMMU 0.35%
$7,126
VTES 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SMMU | VTES | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $92 | $542 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $360 | $2,094 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $1,060 | $6,066 |
- 0.35%SMMU
- 0.05%VTES, cheaper
- Middle half of Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.21%
VTES cheapest of 27 funds
SMMU 23rd cheapest of 27 funds
SMMU vs VTES Dividends
- SMMU 2.86%, better
- VTES 2.67%
- SMMU $1.44
- VTES $2.69
- SMMU $0.12
- VTES $0.19
- SMMU Oct 1, 2026
- VTES Oct 1, 2026
- SMMU Oct 5, 2026
- VTES Oct 5, 2026
- SMMU Monthly
- VTES Monthly
Distribution history
SMMU vs VTES Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SMMU 2.3%, betterVTES 2.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- SMMU −0.24, betterVTES −0.33
- Worst fall
- SMMU −4.5%VTES −3.0%
- Market sensitivity
- SMMU 0.29VTES 0.37
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.