SOXL ranks 4th and TMF 5th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
SOXL vs TMF
9.6%by weight
SOXL −0.15pt a year
0.75%0.90%
SOXL 12.3×the volume
70.7M5.73M
SOXL +56.6pt
+39.4%−17.2%
SOXL vs TMF Performance
+66.7%−87.8%
- SOXL 0.75%, better
- TMF 0.90%
- SOXL $24.3B
- TMF $1.95B
- SOXL +61.4%, better
- TMF −25.0%
- SOXL 0.12%
- TMF 4.68%, better
- SOXL 43
- TMF 14
- SOXL 70.7M sh, better
- TMF 5.73M sh
- SOXL $102.45
- TMF $29.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SOXL | TMF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A87 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D32 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | A79 | A79 |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | B65 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. SOXL and TMF are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SOXLA
TMFA
In short
SOXL A 3x bet on chip stocks that resets every single day. Direxion launched it in 2010, long before AI made semiconductors the market's main event, and it is now one of the most heavily traded leveraged funds out there.
TMF Three times the daily move of long-dated Treasuries, reset every day. Where most 3x funds aim at stocks, TMF points its leverage at the 20-year-plus end of the curve, and has been doing it since 2009.
Stated mandate
SOXL It is designed to deliver a daily result three times the performance of the NYSE Semiconductor Index, before fees and expenses, with the objective applying for a single day.
TMF The Fund seeks pre-fee and expense investment results equal to 300% of the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. It is designed for a single trading day, and longer-period results may differ because daily returns compound.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SOXL vs TMF Holdings
How SOXL and TMF differ
9.6%
Shared holdings make up 13.0% of TMF and 10.8% of SOXL.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings9.6%
- Country89.3%
Sector
No Sector split for TMF.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in SOXLMore in TMF | SOXL | TMF |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | TMF +10.7 points | 89.3% | 100.0% |
| Taiwan | SOXL +4.7 points | 4.7% | 0.0% |
| South Korea | SOXL +3.0 points | 3.0% | 0.0% |
| Netherlands | SOXL +1.5 points | 1.5% | 0.0% |
| Israel | SOXL +1.1 points | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| Singapore | SOXL +0.4 points | 0.4% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- SOXL74.3%
- TMF91.4%
- SOXL32
- TMF4
Asset class
- SOXL
- Equity
- TMF
- Fixed Income
Holdings
- Only in SOXL30
- In both2
- Only in TMF2
Only in SOXL
30 securities, 20.9% of SOXL by weight
- Advanced Micro Devices1.99%
- Intel Corp1.70%
- Micron Technology Inc1.61%
- NVIDIA Corp1.60%
- Broadcom Inc1.54%
- Texas Instruments Inc0.99%
- Analog Devices Inc0.99%
- Qualcomm Inc0.90%
- Marvell Technology Inc0.85%
- Kla Corp0.79%
- Nxp Semiconductors NV0.77%
- Applied Materials Inc0.76%
- Lam Research Corp0.70%
- Taiwan Semiconductor-Sp Adr0.66%
- Monolithic Power Systems Inc0.65%
- Sk Hynix Inc-Adr0.62%
- Teradyne Inc0.53%
- Microchip Technology Inc0.49%
- Astera Labs Inc0.47%
- On Semiconductor0.33%
- Credo Technology Group Holdi0.32%
- Asml Holding Nv-Ny Reg Shs0.31%
- Entegris Inc0.28%
- Tower Semiconductor Ltd0.23%
- Ase Technology Holding -Adr0.21%
- Macom Technology Solutions H0.21%
- Cerebras Systems Inc - A0.13%
- United Microelectron-Sp Adr0.12%
- Arm Holdings Plc-Adr0.09%
- Stmicroelectronics Nv-Ny Shs0.09%
Only in TMF
2 securities, 19.9% of TMF by weight
- Ishares 20+ Year Treasury Bd19.20%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut0.71%
Weight gaps
All 2 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in SOXLMore in TMF | SOXL | TMF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 506 | TMF +0.98 points | 1.94% | 2.92% |
| Jp Morgan 100 Us Trsy Capital 3163 | SOXL +0.12 points | 2.46% | 2.34% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SOXL vs TMF Cost
Overpaying TMF vs SOXL
$2,558
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SOXL 0.75%
$14,482
TMF 0.90%
$17,040
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SOXL | TMF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,593 | $257 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $6,015 | $937 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $17,040 | $2,558 |
- 0.75%SOXL, cheaper
- 0.90%TMF
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
SOXL cheapest of 30 funds
TMF 5th cheapest of 30 funds
SOXL vs TMF Dividends
- SOXL 0.12%
- TMF 4.68%, better
- SOXL $0.09
- TMF $1.40
- SOXL $0.09
- TMF $0.35
- SOXL Sep 22, 2026
- TMF Sep 22, 2026
- SOXL Sep 29, 2026
- TMF Sep 29, 2026
- SOXL Annual
- TMF Quarterly
Distribution history
SOXL vs TMF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SOXL
- TMF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SOXL 137.2%TMF 40.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SOXL 0.90, betterTMF −0.07
- Worst fall
- SOXL −90.5%, betterTMF −90.9%
- Market sensitivity
- SOXL 7.64TMF 7.22
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.