SQQQ ranks 1st and TZA 4th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SQQQ vs TZA
SQQQ −0.05pt a year
0.94%0.99%
SQQQ 2.8×the volume
50M17.8M
TZA +12.5pt
−54.3%−41.8%
SQQQ vs TZA Performance
−93.7%−79.9%
- SQQQ 0.94%, better
- TZA 0.99%
- SQQQ $2.04B
- TZA $191M
- SQQQ −32.5%, better
- TZA −37.2%
- SQQQ 7.78%, better
- TZA 4.06%
- SQQQ 12
- TZA 7
- SQQQ 50M sh, better
- TZA 17.8M sh
- SQQQ $41.85
- TZA $44.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SQQQ | TZA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | B64 |
| Mission | A95Higher | A75 |
| Risk | C47 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A92Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | C47 | |
| Durability | A73Higher | B60 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SQQQ and TZA are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SQQQA
TZAB
In short
SQQQ The workhorse of the short-Nasdaq trade. Running since 2010, it aims at three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100's daily move, resets every session, and charges 0.94% a year, below the going rate in the 3x bear category.
TZA Born in the wreckage of 2008, TZA aims to move three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily swing. A heavily traded way to press a bearish small-cap view, with a daily reset that makes it a tool for days, not quarters.
Stated mandate
SQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100 Index’s daily performance.
TZA The Fund seeks daily inverse leveraged investment results equal to negative three times the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index. Its leverage makes it potentially riskier than nonleveraged alternatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SQQQ vs TZA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SQQQ vs TZA Cost
Overpaying TZA vs SQQQ
$821
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SQQQ 0.94%
$17,704
TZA 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SQQQ | TZA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,661 | $1,746 | $85 |
| 20 | $6,260 | $6,565 | $305 |
| 30 | $17,704 | $18,525 | $821 |
- 0.94%SQQQ, cheaper
- 0.99%TZA
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SQQQ cheapest of 14 funds
TZA 5th cheapest of 14 funds
SQQQ vs TZA Dividends
- SQQQ 7.78%, better
- TZA 4.06%
- SQQQ $3.25
- TZA $1.90
- SQQQ $0.47
- TZA $0.47
- SQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- TZA Sep 22, 2026
- SQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- TZA Sep 29, 2026
- SQQQ Quarterly
- TZA Quarterly
Distribution history
SQQQ vs TZA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SQQQ
- TZA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SQQQ 48.2%, betterTZA 53.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- SQQQ −1.42TZA −1.01, better
- Worst fall
- SQQQ −97.5%TZA −92.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SQQQ −3.43TZA −3.25
Popular comparisons
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.