WLTG ranks 2nd and TMFG 5th of 8 funds in the Global Active Growth Category.
TMFG vs WLTG
WLTG −0.11pt a year
0.85%0.74%
TMFG 1.1×the volume
10K9.39K
WLTG +10.9pt
+12.8%+23.7%
TMFG vs WLTG Performance
−0.4%+10.5%
- TMFG 0.85%
- WLTG 0.74%, better
- TMFG $329M
- WLTG $77M
- TMFG −0.4%
- WLTG +10.5%, better
- TMFG 0.27%
- WLTG 4.09%, better
- TMFG 45
- WLTG 41
- TMFG 10K sh, better
- WLTG 9.39K sh
- TMFG $30.24
- WLTG $38.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TMFG | WLTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D27 | B57Higher |
| Mission | B64 | |
| Risk | C48 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | C49 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | C53Higher | C46 |
| Durability | A78Higher | C51 |
Rank among Global Active Growth funds
Same Category. TMFG and WLTG are both graded against the same 8 Global Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TMFGC
WLTGB
In short
TMFG The Motley Fool's own asset-management arm runs this one: a focused, actively managed portfolio of quality growth companies, with at least 40% of assets outside the US. It started as a 2014 mutual fund and swapped into an ETF wrapper in 2021.
WLTG A growth fund with an escape hatch. Three quarters is a concentrated book of 25 to 35 large-cap names; the rest follows a trend model that can rotate into gold, Treasuries, cash or an inverse ETF when the signal turns negative.
Stated mandate
TMFG The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, focused portfolio of common stocks and depositary receipts, applying a quality-growth approach.
WLTG The Fund seeks long-term capital growth and has a secondary objective of providing dividend income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TMFG vs WLTG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TMFG vs WLTG Cost
Overpaying TMFG vs WLTG
$1,892
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TMFG 0.85%
$16,199
WLTG 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TMFG | WLTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,319 | $189 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,015 | $691 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $14,307 | $1,892 |
- 0.85%TMFG
- 0.74%WLTG, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Active Growth funds
- Median 0.79%
WLTG 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
TMFG 6th cheapest of 8 funds
TMFG vs WLTG Dividends
- TMFG 0.27%
- WLTG 4.09%, better
- TMFG $0.08
- WLTG $1.54
- TMFG $0.08
- WLTG $1.54
- TMFG Dec 18, 2025
- WLTG Dec 24, 2025
- TMFG Dec 19, 2025
- WLTG Dec 26, 2025
- TMFG Annual
- WLTG Annual
Distribution history
TMFG vs WLTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TMFG 13.0%WLTG 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- TMFG 0.65WLTG 1.47, better
- Worst fall
- TMFG −33.7%WLTG −25.1%
- Market sensitivity
- TMFG 1.01WLTG 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.