CGGO ranks 1st and TMFG 5th of 8 funds in the Global Active Growth Category.
CGGO vs TMFG
CGGO −0.38pt a year
0.47%0.85%
CGGO 120.1×the volume
1.2M10K
CGGO +7.1pt
+19.9%+12.8%
CGGO vs TMFG Performance
+8.6%−0.4%
- CGGO 0.47%, better
- TMFG 0.85%
- CGGO $11.9B
- TMFG $329M
- CGGO +8.6%, better
- TMFG −0.4%
- CGGO 1.06%, better
- TMFG 0.27%
- CGGO 108
- TMFG 45
- CGGO 1.2M sh, better
- TMFG 10K sh
- CGGO $37.50
- TMFG $30.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGGO | TMFG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | D27 |
| Mission | B64 | |
| Risk | D35 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | C53 |
| Durability | A84Higher | A78 |
Rank among Global Active Growth funds
Same Category. CGGO and TMFG are both graded against the same 8 Global Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGGOA
TMFGC
In short
CGGO Capital Group's global stock-pickers, wrapped in an ETF: about 100 growth companies picked one at a time, at home and abroad, for 0.47% when the typical active rival in its group charges 0.85%.
TMFG The Motley Fool's own asset-management arm runs this one: a focused, actively managed portfolio of quality growth companies, with at least 40% of assets outside the US. It started as a 2014 mutual fund and swapped into an ETF wrapper in 2021.
Stated mandate
CGGO The fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing primarily in common stocks and cash or money market instruments. Its strategy emphasizes companies with significant growth potential using a bottom-up analysis.
TMFG The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed, focused portfolio of common stocks and depositary receipts, applying a quality-growth approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGGO vs TMFG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGGO vs TMFG Cost
Overpaying TMFG vs CGGO
$6,781
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGGO 0.47%
$9,418
TMFG 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGGO | TMFG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $1,508 | $661 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $5,706 | $2,445 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $16,199 | $6,781 |
- 0.47%CGGO, cheaper
- 0.85%TMFG
- Middle half of Global Active Growth funds
- Median 0.79%
CGGO cheapest of 8 funds
TMFG 6th cheapest of 8 funds
CGGO vs TMFG Dividends
- CGGO 1.06%, better
- TMFG 0.27%
- CGGO $0.40
- TMFG $0.08
- CGGO $0.40
- TMFG $0.08
- CGGO Dec 26, 2025
- TMFG Dec 18, 2025
- CGGO Dec 29, 2025
- TMFG Dec 19, 2025
- CGGO Twice a year
- TMFG Annual
Distribution history
CGGO vs TMFG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGGO 15.7%TMFG 13.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CGGO 0.95, betterTMFG 0.65
- Worst fall
- CGGO −24.9%TMFG −33.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CGGO 1.14TMFG 1.01
CGGO and TMFG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
