VTWO ranks 4th and IWM 6th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
IWM vs VTWO
Same index. Both funds track the Russell 2000 Index.Both track Russell 2000 Index
VTWO −0.13pt a year
0.19%0.06%
IWM 15.1×the volume
21.9M1.45M
VTWO +0.2pt
+10.3%+10.5%
IWM vs VTWO Performance
+30.3%+31.3%
- IWM 0.19%
- VTWO 0.06%, better
- IWM $75.5B
- VTWO $17.3B
- IWM +14.6%
- VTWO +14.8%, better
- IWM 0.98%
- VTWO 1.20%, better
- IWM 1974
- VTWO 2000
- IWM 21.9M sh, better
- VTWO 1.45M sh
- IWM $279.44
- VTWO $112.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWM | VTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A75Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | D34 | D34 |
| Tradability | A91Higher | C54 |
| Holdings | A70 | A70 |
| Durability | A83 | A83 |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. IWM and VTWO are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWMB
VTWOA
In short
IWM The Russell 2000's default trading vehicle. Live since 2000, it packs the small-cap end of the US market into one heavily traded ticker with a deep options market around it. Cheaper funds track the same index; this is the liquid one.
VTWO The Russell 2000 is the small-cap benchmark every headline quotes. VTWO is Vanguard's cheap seat on it: about 2,000 small US companies for 0.06% a year, a fraction of the fee on the best-known fund tracking the same index.
Stated mandate
IWM The Fund seeks to track the Russell 2000 Index, which represents small-capitalization U.S. equities.
VTWO The fund invests in stocks in the Russell 2000 Index and seeks to closely track that index's return, representing small-cap U.S. stock exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWM vs VTWO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWM vs VTWO Cost
Overpaying IWM vs VTWO
$2,682
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWM 0.19%
$3,952
VTWO 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWM | VTWO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $110 | $237 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $432 | $919 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $1,270 | $2,682 |
- 0.19%IWM
- 0.06%VTWO, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VTWO 4th cheapest of 16 funds
IWM 8th cheapest of 16 funds
IWM vs VTWO Dividends
- IWM 0.98%
- VTWO 1.20%, better
- IWM $2.73
- VTWO $1.36
- IWM $0.75
- VTWO $0.39
- IWM Sep 15, 2026
- VTWO Sep 23, 2026
- IWM Sep 18, 2026
- VTWO Sep 25, 2026
- IWM Quarterly
- VTWO Quarterly
Distribution history
IWM vs VTWO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IWM
- VTWO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWM 19.0%VTWO 19.0%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- IWM 0.85VTWO 0.86, better
- Worst fall
- IWM −31.9%VTWO −31.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- IWM 1.14VTWO 1.14Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
IWM and VTWO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





