Skip to content

WQTM vs XQBT

WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund

WQTMACboe

AMPLIFY TOP 10 QUANTUM ETF

XQBT—NYSE Arca

Overlap

27.5%by weight

Expense ratio

WQTM −0.04pt a year

WQTM0.45%XQBT0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

WQTM 105.7×the volume

WQTM203KXQBT1.92K

WQTM vs XQBT Performance

Oct 6, 2026 – Nov 6, 2026

−23.0%WQTM−17.9%XQBT

Oct 6, 2026 to Nov 6, 2026. WQTM −23.0%. XQBT −17.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%Oct 6Oct 21Nov 6
Expense ratio
WQTM 0.45%, better
XQBT 0.49%
Fund size
WQTM $288M
XQBT $2M
1Y total return
WQTM −9.1%
XQBT No data
Holdings
WQTM 57
XQBT 19
Avg volume (30D)
WQTM 203K sh, better
XQBT 1.92K sh
NAV per share
WQTM $26.09
XQBT $19.91
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —XQBTNot yet graded
WQTM: Cost 72, Risk 78, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 89, Durability 91.
Pillar letters and Scores for WQTM, XQBT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarWQTMXQBT
Cost30% weightA72Not scored
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA78Not scored
Tradability15% weightB65Not scored
Holdings10% weightA89Not scored
Durability5% weightA91Not scored

Rank among Quantum Computing & Photonics funds

See all 8 ›

WQTM ranks 2nd of 8 funds in the Quantum Computing & Photonics Category.

  1. Rank 1AEUVCorgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AWQTMWisdomTree Quantum Computing FundScore 75
  3. Rank 3BCQTMCorgi Quantum Computing ETFScore 65
  4. XQBTNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

WQTMAWisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund

XQBT—AMPLIFY TOP 10 QUANTUM ETF

In short

WQTM Plenty of quantum ETFs treat a chip giant and a qubit startup as near-equals. WQTM, built with quantum software firm Classiq, scores how central quantum actually is to each company and pushes weight toward the pure plays.

XQBT No data

Stated mandate

WQTM The Fund passively tracks the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing Index.

XQBT No data

Why people hold it

  • WQTM Every eligible company gets a relevancy score plus a 'pure' or 'diversified' tag, and those two judgments set its weight. Adjacency gets less; quantum-first gets more.wisdomtree.comwisdomtree.com 2
  • The index was co-developed with Classiq, a quantum software firm, and rebalances quarterly, so a fast-moving list of newly public names gets revisited on a set schedule.wisdomtree.com
  • Global reach, roughly 50 stocks, spanning quantum hardware, software, services, cryptography and the enabling tech underneath.thequantuminsider.com
  • Rules-based and passive rather than a manager's stock picks, and it sits in the top quartile of its quantum and photonics peer group on our review.

XQBT No data

Worth knowing

  • WQTM At 0.45%, it prices above the 0.35% median for its cohort, and peers like CQTM and QTUP list less. You pay up for the relevancy-weighted build.
  • Launched in October 2025, so there is little history to judge, and the portfolio is non-diversified: about 50 names inside one young, headline-driven theme.wisdomtree.com
  • Income policy is annual at most, distributing taxable income and capital gains once a year. This is a theme holding, not a cash-flow one.

XQBT No data

Full WQTM profile⁠

Full XQBT profile⁠

WQTM vs XQBT Holdings

As of

How WQTM and XQBT differ

Overlap by weight

27.5%

Shared holdings make up 57.3% of XQBT and 27.8% of WQTM.

Level by level

  • Holdings8 in both27.5%
  • Countryby domicile69.7%
  • Sector4 Sectors81.8%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in WQTM and XQBT, widest gap first
SectorMore in WQTMMore in XQBTGap
Consumer DiscretionaryXQBT +14.5 points
TechnologyWQTM +14.2 points
IndustrialsWQTM +4.0 points
CommunicationXQBT +3.7 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in WQTM and XQBT, widest gap first
CountryMore in WQTMMore in XQBTGap
United StatesXQBT +16.1 points
TaiwanXQBT +14.2 points
JapanWQTM +12.4 points
FinlandWQTM +3.7 points
GermanyWQTM +3.3 points
South KoreaWQTM +2.5 points
CanadaWQTM +2.5 points
SingaporeWQTM +2.5 points
Other countries (4)WQTM +3.5 points

Outside the US: WQTM 91% developed, 9% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • WQTM46.3%
  • XQBT82.5%

Securities held

  • WQTM48
  • XQBT19

Asset class

WQTM
Stocks
XQBT
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in WQTM40
  • In both8
  • Only in XQBT11

Only in WQTM

40 securities, 71.9% of WQTM by weight

  • International Business Machines Corp7.09%
  • Quantinuum Inc-A5.37%
  • Rigetti Computing Inc4.88%

Only in XQBT

11 securities, 55.2% of XQBT by weight

  • Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12/31/203113.40%
  • Quantum Computing Inc.-Swap-Gold-L6.55%
  • Ionq, Inc.-Swap-Nbcb-L6.10%

Weight gaps

All 8 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in WQTM and XQBT, widest gap first
HoldingMore in WQTMMore in XQBTGap
Infleqtion IncINFQXQBT +6.94 points
Amazon.com IncAMZNXQBT +6.77 points
D-Wave Quantum IncQBTSXQBT +5.45 points
Google IncGOOGLXQBT +4.05 points
Microsoft CorpMSFTXQBT +3.35 points
Quantum Computing IncQUBTXQBT +1.64 points
Keysight Technologies IncKEYSXQBT +1.62 points
Ionq IncIONQWQTM +0.35 points

All 48 WQTM holdings⁠All 10 XQBT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

WQTM vs XQBT Cost

Overpaying XQBT vs WQTM

$751

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • WQTM 0.45%

    $9,041

  • XQBT 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • WQTM 0.45%
  • XQBT 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530XQBT $9,792WQTM $9,041

Year by year

YearWQTMXQBTOverpaying
10$812$883$71
20$3,128$3,394$266
30$9,041$9,792$751

Expense ratio

  • 0.45%WQTM, cheaper
  • 0.49%XQBT
  • Middle half of Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
  • Median 0.54%

WQTM 3rd cheapest of 8 funds

XQBT 4th cheapest of 8 funds

WQTM vs XQBT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 6, 2026
Payout (12M)
WQTM None
XQBT None

Distribution history

WQTMAll WQTM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XQBTAll XQBT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

WQTM vs XQBT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
WQTM 50.2%since Nov 2025XQBT No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
WQTM −0.13since Nov 2025XQBT No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
WQTM −42.7%since Oct 2025XQBT No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
WQTM 3.08XQBT 0.00

WQTM and XQBT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • WQTMAvsEUVA

    WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund · Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XQBT—vsEUVA

    AMPLIFY TOP 10 QUANTUM ETF · Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WQTMAvsCQTMB

    WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund · Corgi Quantum Computing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XQBT—vsCQTMB

    AMPLIFY TOP 10 QUANTUM ETF · Corgi Quantum Computing ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WQTMAvsLYTEC

    WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund · Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XQBT—vsLYTEC

    AMPLIFY TOP 10 QUANTUM ETF · Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.