Skip to content

CQTM vs XQBT

Corgi Quantum Computing ETF

CQTMBCboe

AMPLIFY TOP 10 QUANTUM ETF

XQBT—NYSE Arca

Overlap

27.1%by weight

Expense ratio

CQTM −0.14pt a year

CQTM0.35%XQBT0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

CQTM 11.0×the volume

CQTM21.1KXQBT1.92K

CQTM vs XQBT Performance

Oct 6, 2026 – Nov 6, 2026

−25.0%CQTM−17.9%XQBT

Oct 6, 2026 to Nov 6, 2026. CQTM −25.0%. XQBT −17.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−10%0%Oct 6Oct 21Nov 6
Expense ratio
CQTM 0.35%, better
XQBT 0.49%
Fund size
CQTM $15M
XQBT $2M
Holdings
CQTM 20
XQBT 19
Avg volume (30D)
CQTM 21.1K sh, better
XQBT 1.92K sh
NAV per share
CQTM $17.56
XQBT $19.91
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —XQBTNot yet graded
CQTM: Cost 88, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 49, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for CQTM, XQBT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCQTMXQBT
Cost30% weightA88Not scored
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51Not scored
Tradability15% weightC50Not scored
Holdings10% weightC49Not scored
Durability5% weightB55Not scored

Rank among Quantum Computing & Photonics funds

See all 8 ›

CQTM ranks 3rd of 8 funds in the Quantum Computing & Photonics Category.

  1. Rank 1AEUVCorgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AWQTMWisdomTree Quantum Computing FundScore 75
  3. Rank 3BCQTMCorgi Quantum Computing ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 4CLYTERoundhill Photonics & Optics ETFScore 40
  5. XQBTNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CQTMBCorgi Quantum Computing ETF

XQBT—AMPLIFY TOP 10 QUANTUM ETF

In short

CQTM An active take on the quantum race that plays both sides: the companies building the machines and the ones building security meant to survive them. Fee is 0.35% a year, under the typical global thematic fund.

XQBT No data

Stated mandate

CQTM The Fund's stated aim is to increase the value of shareholders' investments.

XQBT No data

Why people hold it

  • CQTM 0.35% a year, comfortably below the median fee for the global thematic funds we grade.
  • The 80% mandate stretches past hardware: quantum-enabled technologies and post-quantum security are in scope, so defense against quantum counts alongside the build-out.
  • Actively managed and global in reach (US and international names), so the manager can rotate as the field moves instead of waiting on an index committee.
  • Lands in the upper half of its global thematic peer group in our grading, with no structural red flags on the wrapper (a standard 1940 Act fund).

XQBT No data

Worth knowing

  • CQTM Launched in 2026, so the track record is short, and volatility has screened high even by single-theme standards. Our read on its risk rests on limited history.
  • Small asset base and light trading volume, which tends to mean wider gaps between the buy and sell price than on household-name ETFs.
  • The mandate targets capital appreciation and the fund has not been paying regular distributions, so this is a price-return holding.

XQBT No data

Full CQTM profile⁠

Full XQBT profile⁠

CQTM vs XQBT Holdings

How CQTM and XQBT differ

Overlap by weight

27.1%

Shared holdings make up 40.6% of CQTM and 35.9% of XQBT.

Level by level

  • Holdings5 in both27.1%
  • Countryby domicile72.7%
  • Sector4 Sectors74.3%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in CQTM and XQBT, widest gap first
SectorMore in CQTMMore in XQBTGap
TechnologyCQTM +20.1 points
Consumer DiscretionaryXQBT +18.3 points
CommunicationXQBT +7.4 points
IndustrialsCQTM +5.5 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CQTM and XQBT, widest gap first
CountryMore in CQTMMore in XQBTGap
TaiwanXQBT +14.2 points
United StatesXQBT +13.1 points
CanadaCQTM +8.7 points
SingaporeCQTM +5.4 points
FinlandCQTM +4.6 points
United KingdomCQTM +4.0 points
SwitzerlandCQTM +2.7 points
FranceCQTM +1.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CQTM74.0%
  • XQBT82.5%

Securities held

  • CQTM19
  • XQBT19

Asset class

CQTM
Stocks
XQBT
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in CQTM14
  • In both5
  • Only in XQBT14

Only in CQTM

14 securities, 59.3% of CQTM by weight

  • Quantinuum Inc7.72%
  • Rigetti Computing Inc7.57%
  • First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20316.50%

Only in XQBT

14 securities, 76.6% of XQBT by weight

  • Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12/31/203113.40%
  • Amazon.com Inc10.55%
  • Microsoft Corp7.46%

Weight gaps

All 5 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CQTM and XQBT, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CQTMMore in XQBTGap
IonQ IncIONQCQTM +12.63 points
Infleqtion IncINFQXQBT +5.84 points
Alphabet IncGOOGLXQBT +1.81 points
D-Wave Quantum IncQBTSXQBT +1.17 points
Quantum Computing IncQUBTCQTM +0.90 points

All 30 CQTM holdings⁠All 10 XQBT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CQTM vs XQBT Cost

Overpaying XQBT vs CQTM

$2,666

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CQTM 0.35%

    $7,126

  • XQBT 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CQTM 0.35%
  • XQBT 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530XQBT $9,792CQTM $7,126

Year by year

YearCQTMXQBTOverpaying
10$634$883$249
20$2,454$3,394$940
30$7,126$9,792$2,666

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%CQTM, cheaper
  • 0.49%XQBT
  • Middle half of Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
  • Median 0.54%

CQTM cheapest of 8 funds

XQBT 4th cheapest of 8 funds

CQTM vs XQBT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 6, 2026
Payout (12M)
CQTM None
XQBT None

Distribution history

CQTMAll CQTM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XQBTAll XQBT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CQTM vs XQBT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CQTM 4.43XQBT 0.00

Popular comparisons

  • CQTMBvsEUVA

    Corgi Quantum Computing ETF · Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XQBT—vsEUVA

    AMPLIFY TOP 10 QUANTUM ETF · Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CQTMBvsWQTMA

    Corgi Quantum Computing ETF · WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XQBT—vsWQTMA

    AMPLIFY TOP 10 QUANTUM ETF · WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CQTMBvsLYTEC

    Corgi Quantum Computing ETF · Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XQBT—vsLYTEC

    AMPLIFY TOP 10 QUANTUM ETF · Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.