CQTM ranks 3rd of 8 funds in the Quantum Computing & Photonics Category.
CQTM vs XQBT
27.1%by weight
CQTM −0.14pt a year
0.35%0.49%
CQTM 11.0×the volume
21.1K1.92K
CQTM vs XQBT Performance
−25.0%−17.9%
- CQTM 0.35%, better
- XQBT 0.49%
- CQTM $15M
- XQBT $2M
- CQTM 20
- XQBT 19
- CQTM 21.1K sh, better
- XQBT 1.92K sh
- CQTM $17.56
- XQBT $19.91
ETF.net Grade
- —XQBTNot yet graded
| Pillar | CQTM | XQBT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88 | |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C51 | |
| Tradability | C50 | |
| Holdings | C49 | |
| Durability | B55 |
Rank among Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
Our read on each fund
CQTMB
XQBT—
In short
CQTM An active take on the quantum race that plays both sides: the companies building the machines and the ones building security meant to survive them. Fee is 0.35% a year, under the typical global thematic fund.
Stated mandate
CQTM The Fund's stated aim is to increase the value of shareholders' investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CQTM vs XQBT Holdings
How CQTM and XQBT differ
27.1%
Shared holdings make up 40.6% of CQTM and 35.9% of XQBT.
Level by level
- Holdings27.1%
- Country72.7%
- Sector74.3%
Sector
| Sector | More in CQTMMore in XQBT | Gap | CQTM | XQBT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | CQTM +20.1 points | 89.1% | 69.0% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | XQBT +18.3 points | 0.0% | 18.3% | |
| Communication | XQBT +7.4 points | 5.3% | 12.7% | |
| Industrials | CQTM +5.5 points | 5.5% | 0.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CQTMMore in XQBT | Gap | CQTM | XQBT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taiwan | XQBT +14.2 points | 0.0% | 14.2% | |
| United States | XQBT +13.1 points | 72.7% | 85.8% | |
| Canada | CQTM +8.7 points | 8.7% | 0.0% | |
| Singapore | CQTM +5.4 points | 5.4% | 0.0% | |
| Finland | CQTM +4.6 points | 4.6% | 0.0% | |
| United Kingdom | CQTM +4.0 points | 4.0% | 0.0% | |
| Switzerland | CQTM +2.7 points | 2.7% | 0.0% | |
| France | CQTM +1.8 points | 1.8% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CQTM74.0%
- XQBT82.5%
- CQTM19
- XQBT19
Asset class
- CQTM
- Stocks
- XQBT
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in CQTM14
- In both5
- Only in XQBT14
Only in CQTM
14 securities, 59.3% of CQTM by weight
- Quantinuum Inc7.72%
- Rigetti Computing Inc7.57%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20316.50%
- International Business Machines Corp6.49%
- Honeywell International Inc5.17%
- Horizon Quantum Holdings LTD4.20%
- Arqit Quantum Inc4.05%
- IQM Quantum Computers Oyj3.60%
- FormFactor Inc3.45%
- BTQ Technologies Corp3.09%
- Quantum Emotion Corp2.49%
- SEALSQ Corp2.19%
- Pasqal Holding SA1.37%
- Xanadu Quantum Technologies Ltd1.37%
Only in XQBT
14 securities, 76.6% of XQBT by weight
- Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12/31/203113.40%
- Amazon.com Inc10.55%
- Microsoft Corp7.46%
- Quantum Computing Inc.-Swap-Gold-L6.55%
- Ionq, Inc.-Swap-Nbcb-L6.10%
- Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.-Swap-Gold-L5.90%
- Microsoft Corporation-Swap-Nbcb-L5.30%
- Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd4.31%
- Quanta Computer Inc.-Swap-Gold-L4.13%
- Ionq, Inc.-Swap-Gold-L3.50%
- Keysight Technologies Inc3.42%
- Quanta Computer Inc2.68%
- Keysight Technologies, Inc.-Swap-Nbcb-L1.67%
- Microsoft Corporation-Swap-Mrex-L1.67%
Weight gaps
All 5 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in CQTMMore in XQBT | Gap | CQTM | XQBT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IonQ Inc | CQTM +12.63 points | 17.66% | 5.03% | |
| Infleqtion Inc | XQBT +5.84 points | 4.97% | 10.81% | |
| Alphabet Inc | XQBT +1.81 points | 5.06% | 6.87% | |
| D-Wave Quantum Inc | XQBT +1.17 points | 8.38% | 9.55% | |
| Quantum Computing Inc | CQTM +0.90 points | 4.52% | 3.62% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CQTM vs XQBT Cost
Overpaying XQBT vs CQTM
$2,666
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CQTM 0.35%
$7,126
XQBT 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CQTM | XQBT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $883 | $249 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $3,394 | $940 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $9,792 | $2,666 |
- 0.35%CQTM, cheaper
- 0.49%XQBT
- Middle half of Quantum Computing & Photonics funds
- Median 0.54%
CQTM cheapest of 8 funds
XQBT 4th cheapest of 8 funds
CQTM vs XQBT Dividends
- CQTM None
- XQBT None
Distribution history
CQTM vs XQBT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- CQTM 4.43XQBT 0.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.