XBJL ranks 2nd and XBJA 3rd of 6 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer Category.
XBJA vs XBJL
0.3%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.79%0.79%
XBJA 1.8×the volume
7.68K4.32K
XBJL +1.2pt
+12.1%+13.3%
XBJA vs XBJL Performance
+10.2%+8.5%
- XBJA 0.79%
- XBJL 0.79%
- XBJA $94M
- XBJL $77M
- XBJA +10.2%, better
- XBJL +8.5%
- XBJA 4
- XBJL 5
- XBJA 7.68K sh, better
- XBJL 4.32K sh
- XBJA $34.79
- XBJL $40.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | XBJA | XBJL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | B59 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C40 | C50Higher |
| Tradability | B57Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | B59 | |
| Durability | B63 | B64Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer funds
Same Category. XBJA and XBJL are both graded against the same 6 S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
XBJAC
XBJLB
In short
XBJA Most buffered ETFs buy protection by selling away your upside. XBJA goes after both: twice SPY's price move up to a cap, roughly one-times exposure on the way down, and the first 9% of losses absorbed over a period that runs January to December.
XBJL Most buffer ETFs give up upside to buy protection. XBJL flips it: each July-to-June period aims for twice the S&P 500 ETF's price gain up to a cap, with the first 9% of losses absorbed.
Stated mandate
XBJA The fund seeks to deliver twice SPY's upside return up to a cap, with approximately one-times downside exposure, over a one-year outcome period. It protects the first 9% of losses during that period.
XBJL The fund seeks twice the upside return of an ETF tracking the S&P 500 Index, subject to a cap, while providing approximately one-to-one downside exposure after a 9% buffer over the annual outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
XBJA vs XBJL Holdings
How XBJA and XBJL differ
0.3%
Shared holdings make up 0.5% of XBJL and 0.3% of XBJA.
Level by level
- Holdings0.3%
- Sector98.1%
Sector
| Sector | More in XBJAMore in XBJL | XBJA | XBJL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | XBJA +1.4 points | 40.1% | 38.7% |
| Financials | XBJL +0.7 points | 11.3% | 12.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | XBJL +0.6 points | 8.7% | 9.3% |
| Communication | XBJA +0.4 points | 9.9% | 9.5% |
| Industrials | XBJL +0.2 points | 7.6% | 7.8% |
| Materials | XBJL +0.1 points | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| Utilities | XBJL +0.1 points | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Energy | XBJL +0.1 points | 3.4% | 3.5% |
| Real Estate | XBJL +0.1 points | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Health Care | XBJA +0.1 points | 9.4% | 9.3% |
| Consumer Staples | XBJL +0.1 points | 4.4% | 4.5% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in XBJAMore in XBJL | XBJA | XBJL |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- XBJA112.7%
- XBJL109.7%
- XBJA4
- XBJL5
Asset class
- XBJA
- Equity
- XBJL
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in XBJA3
- In both1
- Only in XBJL4
Only in XBJA
3 securities, 100% of XBJA by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 6.79 C100.77%
- Spy 12/31/2026 681.89 C11.02%
- Spy 12/31/2026 681.89 P0.67%
Only in XBJL
4 securities, 100% of XBJL by weight
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF97.27%
- Voo 06/30/2027 686.82 C7.55%
- Voo 06/30/2027 686.82 P4.26%
- Voo 06/30/2027 714.29 C0.10%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in XBJAMore in XBJL | XBJA | XBJL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037 | XBJL +0.24 points | 0.28% | 0.52% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
XBJA vs XBJL Cost
Same expense ratio
$15,174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
XBJA 0.79%
$15,174
XBJL 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | XBJA | XBJL |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,405 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,331 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $15,174 |
- 0.79%XBJA
- 0.79%XBJL
- Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer funds
- Median 0.79%
XBJA cheapest of 6 funds
XBJL cheapest of 6 funds
XBJA vs XBJL Dividends
- XBJA None
- XBJL None
Distribution history
XBJA vs XBJL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- XBJA 5.7%XBJL 5.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- XBJA 1.27XBJL 1.54, better
- Worst fall
- XBJA −17.4%XBJL −11.8%
- Market sensitivity
- XBJA 0.40XBJL 0.40Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.