Skip to content

XBJA vs XBJL

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF

XBJACCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF

XBJLBCboe

Overlap

0.3%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

XBJA0.79%XBJL0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

XBJA 1.8×the volume

XBJA7.68KXBJL4.32K

3Y return · a year

XBJL +1.2pt

XBJA+12.1%XBJL+13.3%

XBJA vs XBJL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.2%XBJA+8.5%XBJL

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. XBJA +10.2%. XBJL +8.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
XBJA 0.79%
XBJL 0.79%
Fund size
XBJA $94M
XBJL $77M
1Y total return
XBJA +10.2%, better
XBJL +8.5%
Holdings
XBJA 4
XBJL 5
Avg volume (30D)
XBJA 7.68K sh, better
XBJL 4.32K sh
NAV per share
XBJA $34.79
XBJL $40.92
52W range

ETF.net Grade

XBJA: Cost 59, Risk 40, Mission not scored, Tradability 57, Holdings not scored, Durability 63. XBJL: Cost 59, Risk 50, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings 59, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for XBJA, XBJL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarXBJAXBJL
Cost30% weightB59B59
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC40C50Higher
Tradability15% weightB57HigherB55
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB59
Durability5% weightB63B64Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. XBJA and XBJL are both graded against the same 6 S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 6 ›

XBJL ranks 2nd and XBJA 3rd of 6 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BXBAPInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BXBJLInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 3CXBJAInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETFScore 54
  4. Rank 4CXBOCInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

XBJACInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF

XBJLBInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF

In short

XBJA Most buffered ETFs buy protection by selling away your upside. XBJA goes after both: twice SPY's price move up to a cap, roughly one-times exposure on the way down, and the first 9% of losses absorbed over a period that runs January to December.

XBJL Most buffer ETFs give up upside to buy protection. XBJL flips it: each July-to-June period aims for twice the S&P 500 ETF's price gain up to a cap, with the first 9% of losses absorbed.

Stated mandate

XBJA The fund seeks to deliver twice SPY's upside return up to a cap, with approximately one-times downside exposure, over a one-year outcome period. It protects the first 9% of losses during that period.

XBJL The fund seeks twice the upside return of an ETF tracking the S&P 500 Index, subject to a cap, while providing approximately one-to-one downside exposure after a 9% buffer over the annual outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • XBJA Two-way structure: 2x SPY's price gain up to a cap, about 1x exposure on the downside, and the first 9 percentage points of a decline absorbed over the one-year outcome period.innovatoretfs.com
  • No expiration date. The period closes December 31 and the fund resets with a fresh 9% buffer and a newly set cap, so the outcome year and the calendar year move together.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.79% expense ratio, the same sticker as the rest of Innovator's accelerated buffer shelf, including its April sibling XBAP.
  • Listed in January 2022, so several full reset cycles are already in the rear-view mirror rather than one untested outcome period.
  • XBJL Double up, not give up. It targets 2x the underlying S&P 500 ETF's price return to a cap, with downside one-to-one after a 9% buffer. Leverage runs one direction.innovatoretfs.com
  • It rolls itself. Each period runs July 1 to June 30, with a fresh cap and buffer struck at the reset. No maturity date, no options to roll.sec.gov
  • Fees are 0.79%, the same sticker as Innovator's other accelerated buffer funds (XBAP, XBJA, XBOC). The July start date costs no premium.
  • FLEX options on SPY, cleared by the Options Clearing Corporation, inside a 1940 Act fund launched in 2021. Plain brokerage account, no bank note.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • XBJA Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever cap room and buffer remain. After a run-up, the upside left can be thinner and the downside exposure larger than the headline terms suggest.innovatoretfs.com
  • The math runs off SPY's price return, so the S&P 500's dividends are not passed through. Innovator's own materials say the fund is not built for income seekers.innovatoretfs.com
  • Volume is light next to the headline buffer funds, which puts more weight on trading carefully: check the spread and use limit orders.
  • XBJL Outcomes are engineered for holders who own it from a period's first day to its last. Buy or sell mid-period and your effective cap and buffer differ.sec.gov
  • Returns follow the underlying ETF's share price only. The fund does not receive its dividends, the trade for accelerated upside.sec.gov
  • It trades far less actively than the plain S&P 500 funds underneath it, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads in fast markets.

Full XBJA profile⁠

Full XBJL profile⁠

XBJA vs XBJL Holdings

How XBJA and XBJL differ

Overlap by weight

0.3%

Shared holdings make up 0.5% of XBJL and 0.3% of XBJA.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both0.3%
  • Sector11 Sectors98.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in XBJA and XBJL, widest gap first
SectorMore in XBJAMore in XBJL
TechnologyXBJA +1.4 points
FinancialsXBJL +0.7 points
Consumer DiscretionaryXBJL +0.6 points
CommunicationXBJA +0.4 points
IndustrialsXBJL +0.2 points
MaterialsXBJL +0.1 points
UtilitiesXBJL +0.1 points
EnergyXBJL +0.1 points
Real EstateXBJL +0.1 points
Health CareXBJA +0.1 points
Consumer StaplesXBJL +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in XBJA and XBJL, widest gap first
CountryMore in XBJAMore in XBJL
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • XBJA112.7%
  • XBJL109.7%

Securities held

  • XBJA4
  • XBJL5

Asset class

XBJA
Equity
XBJL
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in XBJA3
  • In both1
  • Only in XBJL4

Only in XBJA

3 securities, 100% of XBJA by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 6.79 C100.77%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 681.89 C11.02%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 681.89 P0.67%

Only in XBJL

4 securities, 100% of XBJL by weight

  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF97.27%
  • Voo 06/30/2027 686.82 C7.55%
  • Voo 06/30/2027 686.82 P4.26%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in XBJA and XBJL, widest gap first
HoldingMore in XBJAMore in XBJL
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037XBJL +0.24 points

All 7 XBJA holdings⁠All 7 XBJL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

XBJA vs XBJL Cost

Same expense ratio

$15,174

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • XBJA 0.79%

    $15,174

  • XBJL 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • XBJA 0.79%
  • XBJL 0.79%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XBJA $15,174XBJL $15,174

Year by year

YearXBJAXBJL
10$1,405$1,405
20$5,331$5,331
30$15,174$15,174

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%XBJA
  • 0.79%XBJL
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer funds
  • Median 0.79%

XBJA cheapest of 6 funds

XBJL cheapest of 6 funds

XBJA vs XBJL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
XBJA None
XBJL None

Distribution history

XBJAAll XBJA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XBJLAll XBJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XBJA vs XBJL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
XBJA 5.7%XBJL 5.4%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
XBJA 1.27XBJL 1.54, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
XBJA −17.4%since Jan 2022XBJL −11.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
XBJA 0.40XBJL 0.40Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

Popular comparisons

  • XBJACvsXBAPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XBJLBvsXBAPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XBJACvsXBOCC

    Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XBJLBvsXBOCC

    Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XBJACvsXTJLC

    Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XBJLBvsXTJLC

    Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.