XBJA ranks 3rd and XBOC 4th of 6 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer Category.
XBJA vs XBOC
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.79%0.79%
XBJA 1.5×the volume
7.68K5.18K
XBJA +0.3pt
+12.1%+11.8%
XBJA vs XBOC Performance
+10.2%+9.8%
- XBJA 0.79%
- XBOC 0.79%
- XBJA $94M
- XBOC $59M
- XBJA +10.2%, better
- XBOC +9.8%
- XBJA 4
- XBOC 5
- XBJA 7.68K sh, better
- XBOC 5.18K sh
- XBJA $34.79
- XBOC $36.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | XBJA | XBOC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | B59 |
| Mission | A92 | |
| Risk | C40 | C42Higher |
| Tradability | B57Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | B58 | |
| Durability | B63Higher | C49 |
Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer funds
Same Category. XBJA and XBOC are both graded against the same 6 S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
XBJAC
XBOCC
In short
XBJA Most buffered ETFs buy protection by selling away your upside. XBJA goes after both: twice SPY's price move up to a cap, roughly one-times exposure on the way down, and the first 9% of losses absorbed over a period that runs January to December.
XBOC Double the S&P 500's upside to a preset cap, with the first 9% of a drop absorbed and ordinary exposure after that. XBOC runs that bargain on an October-to-September clock and resets for a new one every year.
Stated mandate
XBJA The fund seeks to deliver twice SPY's upside return up to a cap, with approximately one-times downside exposure, over a one-year outcome period. It protects the first 9% of losses during that period.
XBOC The Fund seeks to deliver twice the increase of its Underlying ETF during the Outcome Period, subject to an upside return cap.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
XBJA vs XBOC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
XBJA vs XBOC Cost
Same expense ratio
$15,174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
XBJA 0.79%
$15,174
XBOC 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | XBJA | XBOC |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,405 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,331 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $15,174 |
- 0.79%XBJA
- 0.79%XBOC
- Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer funds
- Median 0.79%
XBJA cheapest of 6 funds
XBOC cheapest of 6 funds
XBJA vs XBOC Dividends
- XBJA None
- XBOC None
Distribution history
XBJA vs XBOC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- XBJA 5.7%, betterXBOC 6.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- XBJA 1.27, betterXBOC 1.16
- Worst fall
- XBJA −17.4%XBOC −13.4%
- Market sensitivity
- XBJA 0.40XBOC 0.40Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.