XBJL ranks 2nd and XBOC 4th of 6 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer Category.
XBJL vs XBOC
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.79%0.79%
XBOC 1.2×the volume
4.32K5.18K
XBJL +1.1pt
+9.0%+7.9%
XBJL vs XBOC Performance
+54.0%+46.3%
- XBJL 0.79%
- XBOC 0.79%
- XBJL $77M
- XBOC $59M
- XBJL +8.5%
- XBOC +9.8%, better
- XBJL 5
- XBOC 5
- XBJL 4.32K sh
- XBOC 5.18K sh, better
- XBJL $40.92
- XBOC $36.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | XBJL | XBOC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | B59 |
| Mission | A92 | |
| Risk | C50Higher | C42 |
| Tradability | B55Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | B59Higher | B58 |
| Durability | B64Higher | C49 |
Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer funds
Same Category. XBJL and XBOC are both graded against the same 6 S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
XBJLB
XBOCC
In short
XBJL Most buffer ETFs give up upside to buy protection. XBJL flips it: each July-to-June period aims for twice the S&P 500 ETF's price gain up to a cap, with the first 9% of losses absorbed.
XBOC Double the S&P 500's upside to a preset cap, with the first 9% of a drop absorbed and ordinary exposure after that. XBOC runs that bargain on an October-to-September clock and resets for a new one every year.
Stated mandate
XBJL The fund seeks twice the upside return of an ETF tracking the S&P 500 Index, subject to a cap, while providing approximately one-to-one downside exposure after a 9% buffer over the annual outcome period.
XBOC The Fund seeks to deliver twice the increase of its Underlying ETF during the Outcome Period, subject to an upside return cap.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
XBJL vs XBOC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
XBJL vs XBOC Cost
Same expense ratio
$15,174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
XBJL 0.79%
$15,174
XBOC 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | XBJL | XBOC |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,405 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,331 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $15,174 |
- 0.79%XBJL
- 0.79%XBOC
- Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated, 9-12% Buffer funds
- Median 0.79%
XBJL cheapest of 6 funds
XBOC cheapest of 6 funds
XBJL vs XBOC Dividends
- XBJL None
- XBOC None
Distribution history
XBJL vs XBOC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- XBJL
- XBOC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- XBJL 5.4%, betterXBOC 6.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- XBJL 1.54, betterXBOC 1.16
- Worst fall
- XBJL −11.8%, betterXBOC −13.4%
- Market sensitivity
- XBJL 0.40XBOC 0.40Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.