Skip to content

XTAP vs XUSP

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

XTAPBCboe

Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF

XUSPBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

XTAP0.79%XUSP0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

XUSP 2.6×the volume

XTAP1.47KXUSP3.85K

3Y return · a year

XUSP +7.4pt

XTAP+19.1%XUSP+26.5%

XTAP vs XUSP Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+17.3%XTAP+9.6%XUSP

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. XTAP +17.3%. XUSP +9.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
XTAP 0.79%
XUSP 0.79%
Fund size
XTAP $19M
XUSP $53M
1Y total return
XTAP +17.3%, better
XUSP +9.6%
Holdings
XTAP 5
XUSP 9
Avg volume (30D)
XTAP 1.47K sh
XUSP 3.85K sh, better
NAV per share
XTAP $46.72
XUSP $52.61
52W range

ETF.net Grade

XTAP: Cost 63, Risk 88, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 57, Durability 70. XUSP: Cost 63, Risk 20, Mission not scored, Tradability 71, Holdings not scored, Durability 72.
Pillar letters and Scores for XTAP, XUSP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarXTAPXUSP
Cost30% weightB63B63
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA88HigherF20
Tradability15% weightC45A71Higher
Holdings10% weightB57Not scored
Durability5% weightA70A72Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. XTAP and XUSP are both graded against the same 12 S&P 500 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Accelerated⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

XTAP ranks 2nd and XUSP 6th of 12 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated Category.

  1. Rank 1ATWOXiShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BXTAPInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETFScore 65
  3. Rank 3BXDSQInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 4BXTOCInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 6BXUSPInnovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 7DDGAPFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - AprilScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

XTAPBInnovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

XUSPBInnovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF

In short

XTAP Most equity funds hand you the market's move. XTAP aims to triple the S&P 500's gain over an April-to-March year, up to a cap, while taking declines roughly one for one. No buffer, no daily reset: you trade a ceiling for acceleration.

XUSP Most accelerated funds buy extra upside by selling you a cap. XUSP skips the cap: each option package sits out SPY's first 5% of gains, then aims to amplify what comes after, on a rolling quarterly ladder.

Stated mandate

XTAP The fund seeks three times the increase of its S&P 500-tracking Underlying ETF over the annual April 1–March 31 outcome period, subject to a cap. It bears Underlying ETF losses one-for-one and provides no buffer; the current period is April 1, 2026 through March 31, 2027, with a 19.47% pre-fee cap.

XUSP XUSP seeks potential to outperform SPY’s price return once its performance thresholds are exceeded. It pursues uncapped enhanced upside through four one-year FLEX option packages with laddered quarterly expirations; each package does not participate in SPY’s first 5% of gains.

Why people hold it

  • XTAP Triples the index's upside to a cap using options that reset each April 1. No daily reset, no compounding drift from holding through a choppy stretch, no borrowed money.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79% it sits at the going rate for accelerated funds and undercuts First Trust's enhance-and-buffer siblings on the same index (XMAR, XJUN) at 0.85%.
  • Live since 2021 and built to roll: the fund resets at the end of each outcome period and can be held straight through, so there is no annual ticker swap.innovatoretfs.com
  • One of the stronger implementations in its accelerated S&P 500 peer group on cost and structure.
  • XUSP Uncapped by design. Where most enhanced-upside strategies bolt a ceiling onto the payoff, this one aims to keep amplifying SPY's advance above the threshold.globenewswire.com
  • Four one-year FLEX option packages expire on a quarterly ladder, so no single start date sets the terms for your whole position the way a dated outcome fund does.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79%, the fee sits level with the median for accelerated SPY strategies, including Innovator siblings XTAP and XDSQ. The uncapped twist doesn't cost more.

Worth knowing

  • XTAP The ceiling is the whole bargain. Upside stops at the cap, which is reset for each new period, and mid-period buyers get whatever cap is left rather than the headline number.innovatoretfs.com
  • No buffer here. Index declines land on you roughly one for one, and the outcomes are designed around holding from the first day of the period to the last.innovatoretfs.com
  • A small, lightly traded fund with no distributions in the past year, so wider spreads and a total-return-only profile come with the package.
  • XUSP The 5% giveback is the price of admission. Each package skips SPY's first 5% of gains, which stings most in flat or single-digit years.innovatoretfs.com
  • The engineering is all on the upside. There's no buffer, and the reference point is SPY's price return, so dividends sit outside the payoff.innovatoretfs.com
  • Small and thinly traded next to plain index funds, so limit orders and avoiding the opening and closing minutes are worth the habit.

Full XTAP profile⁠

Full XUSP profile⁠

XTAP vs XUSP Holdings

How XTAP and XUSP differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.3% of XUSP and 0.0% of XTAP.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors98.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in XTAP and XUSP, widest gap first
SectorMore in XTAPMore in XUSP
TechnologyXUSP +1.4 points
FinancialsXTAP +0.7 points
Consumer DiscretionaryXTAP +0.6 points
CommunicationXUSP +0.4 points
IndustrialsXTAP +0.2 points
MaterialsXTAP +0.1 points
UtilitiesXTAP +0.1 points
EnergyXTAP +0.1 points
Real EstateXTAP +0.1 points
Health CareXUSP +0.1 points
Consumer StaplesXTAP +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in XTAP and XUSP, widest gap first
CountryMore in XTAPMore in XUSP
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • XTAP136.0%
  • XUSP110.7%

Securities held

  • XTAP4
  • XUSP9

Asset class

XTAP
Equity
XUSP
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in XTAP3
  • In both1
  • Only in XUSP8

Only in XTAP

3 securities, 100% of XTAP by weight

  • Vanguard S&P 500 ETF101.07%
  • Voo 03/31/2027 597.57 C34.00%
  • Voo 03/31/2027 621.47 C0.30%

Only in XUSP

8 securities, 100% of XUSP by weight

  • Spy 09/30/2027 7.66 C25.97%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 6.85 C25.40%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 7.5 C24.31%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in XTAP and XUSP, widest gap first
HoldingMore in XTAPMore in XUSP
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037XUSP +0.23 points

All 5 XTAP holdings⁠All 13 XUSP holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

XTAP vs XUSP Cost

Same expense ratio

$15,174

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • XTAP 0.79%

    $15,174

  • XUSP 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • XTAP 0.79%
  • XUSP 0.79%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XTAP $15,174XUSP $15,174

Year by year

YearXTAPXUSP
10$1,405$1,405
20$5,331$5,331
30$15,174$15,174

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%XTAP
  • 0.79%XUSP
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTAP 3rd cheapest of 12 funds

XUSP 3rd cheapest of 12 funds

XTAP vs XUSP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
XTAP None
XUSP None

Distribution history

XTAPAll XTAP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XUSPAll XUSP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTAP vs XUSP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
XTAP 6.8%, betterXUSP 16.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
XTAP 1.97, betterXUSP 1.23
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
XTAP −22.1%XUSP −22.6%since Aug 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
XTAP 0.48XUSP 1.36

Popular comparisons

  • XTAPBvsTWOXA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF · iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XUSPBvsTWOXA

    Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF · iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAPBvsXDSQB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XUSPBvsXDSQB

    Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTAPBvsXTJAB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XUSPBvsXTJAB

    Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.