CMDT ranks 4th and ACOM 7th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
ACOM vs CMDT
CMDT −0.28pt a year
0.93%0.65%
CMDT 101.5×the volume
64965.9K
ACOM vs CMDT Performance
+11.7%+7.3%
- ACOM 0.93%
- CMDT 0.65%, better
- ACOM $7M
- CMDT $890M
- ACOM
- CMDT +28.0%
- ACOM
- CMDT 12.09%
- ACOM 26
- CMDT 357
- ACOM 649 sh
- CMDT 65.9K sh, better
- ACOM $24.37
- CMDT $31.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACOM | CMDT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | B61Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A98Higher | A81 |
| Tradability | D30 | C51Higher |
| Holdings | A70 | |
| Durability | D31 | A72Higher |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. ACOM and CMDT are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACOMC
CMDTB
In short
ACOM Most commodity ETFs bolt themselves to a fixed index. This one hands the wheel to Quantix, an ex-Goldman commodities team, to actively trade futures, options and swaps, with the Quantix Commodity Index as the yardstick.
CMDT PIMCO took the standard commodity futures fund and added the thing it is known for: an actively managed bond portfolio sitting behind the commodity bets. The mandate is to beat the Bloomberg Commodity Index, not mirror it.
Stated mandate
ACOM The Fund seeks commodity-market exposure through actively managed commodity instruments, including futures, options, over-the-counter swaps, and other commodity-linked derivatives. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in instruments providing commodity exposure.
CMDT The fund aims to achieve a total return that outperforms the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while maintaining prudent investment management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACOM vs CMDT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACOM vs CMDT Cost
Overpaying ACOM vs CMDT
$4,822
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACOM 0.93%
$17,539
CMDT 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACOM | CMDT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $1,163 | $481 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $4,440 | $1,759 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $12,717 | $4,822 |
- 0.93%ACOM
- 0.65%CMDT, cheaper
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
CMDT 6th cheapest of 13 funds
ACOM 10th cheapest of 13 funds
ACOM vs CMDT Dividends
- ACOM
- CMDT 12.09%
- ACOM None
- CMDT $3.83
- ACOM
- CMDT $3.20
- ACOM
- CMDT Oct 1, 2026
- ACOM
- CMDT Oct 5, 2026
- ACOM
- CMDT Quarterly
Distribution history
ACOM vs CMDT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACOM CMDT 11.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACOM CMDT 0.83
- Worst fall
- ACOM CMDT −13.2%
- Market sensitivity
- ACOM 1.46CMDT 0.78
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.