Skip to content

ACOM vs CMDT

Harbor Active Commodity ETF

ACOMCNYSE Arca

PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

CMDTBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

CMDT −0.28pt a year

ACOM0.93%CMDT0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

CMDT 101.5×the volume

ACOM649CMDT65.9K

ACOM vs CMDT Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.7%ACOM+7.3%CMDT

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ACOM +11.7%. CMDT +7.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ACOM 0.93%
CMDT 0.65%, better
Fund size
ACOM $7M
CMDT $890M
1Y total return
ACOM No data
CMDT +28.0%
Yield (12M)
ACOM No data
CMDT 12.09%
Holdings
ACOM 26
CMDT 357
Avg volume (30D)
ACOM 649 sh
CMDT 65.9K sh, better
NAV per share
ACOM $24.37
CMDT $31.84
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACOM: Cost 23, Risk 98, Mission not scored, Tradability 30, Holdings not scored, Durability 31. CMDT: Cost 61, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings 70, Durability 72.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACOM, CMDT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACOMCMDT
Cost30% weightF23B61Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA98HigherA81
Tradability15% weightD30C51Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA70
Durability5% weightD31A72Higher

Rank among Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACOM and CMDT are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 13 funds
See all 13 ›

CMDT ranks 4th and ACOM 7th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1APDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2BSOYBTeucrium Soybean FundScore 65
  3. Rank 2BWEATTeucrium Wheat FundScore 65
  4. Rank 4BCMDTPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded FundScore 64
  5. Rank 5BUSGUSCF Gold Strategy Plus Income FundScore 62
  6. Rank 6BDBBInvesco DB Base Metals FundScore 61
  7. Rank 7CACOMHarbor Active Commodity ETFScore 42
  8. Rank 7CHARDSimplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACOMCHarbor Active Commodity ETF

CMDTBPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

In short

ACOM Most commodity ETFs bolt themselves to a fixed index. This one hands the wheel to Quantix, an ex-Goldman commodities team, to actively trade futures, options and swaps, with the Quantix Commodity Index as the yardstick.

CMDT PIMCO took the standard commodity futures fund and added the thing it is known for: an actively managed bond portfolio sitting behind the commodity bets. The mandate is to beat the Bloomberg Commodity Index, not mirror it.

Stated mandate

ACOM The Fund seeks commodity-market exposure through actively managed commodity instruments, including futures, options, over-the-counter swaps, and other commodity-linked derivatives. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in instruments providing commodity exposure.

CMDT The fund aims to achieve a total return that outperforms the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while maintaining prudent investment management.

Why people hold it

  • ACOM Genuinely active, not index-plus: the subadviser picks and sizes futures, options and OTC swaps across commodity markets rather than following set index weights.nasdaqtrader.comharborcapital.com
  • The bench behind it: Quantix is led by CIO Don Casturo, formerly Goldman Sachs' global commodities COO, and the same shop runs Harbor's index-based commodity ETF and built the Quantix Commodity Index.harborcapital.comharborcapital.com 2
  • Built as a 1940 Act fund, with commodity derivatives routed through a wholly owned Cayman subsidiary, the standard plumbing for keeping this exposure inside fund tax rules.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • The mandate has guardrails: at least 80% of net assets must sit in commodity-exposure instruments, so it stays a commodity fund however the manager shifts between markets.nasdaqtrader.com
  • CMDT Active by design. The stated objective is to outperform the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, not replicate it.
  • Two engines in one ticker: swaps, futures and commodity-linked notes for the commodity exposure, an actively managed fixed income portfolio as the collateral behind them.
  • A 1940 Act fund that routes commodity-linked exposure through a Cayman subsidiary, so holders get a 1099 rather than a partnership K-1.
  • Global commodity reach spread across roughly 300 positions, with cash distributed quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • ACOM Active discretion carries a price: 0.93% a year, above the median for futures-based commodity funds, several of which run cheaper index strategies (PDBC at 0.74%).
  • It launched in 2026, so there is no long public record for the strategy in this wrapper, and it remains small and thinly traded next to the category's established names.harborcapital.com
  • Returns come from a derivatives book, not a coupon: commodity futures and swaps can move sharply, and the fund has not been paying distributions.harborcapital.com
  • CMDT At 0.98% a year, it sits above cheaper index-based options in the commodity futures group such as PDBC (0.74%) and HARD (0.78%). Active management is what the premium buys.
  • Tracking is not the goal here. Manager calls can push results away from the Bloomberg Commodity Index in either direction.
  • The bond collateral sleeve brings interest rate and credit sensitivity that a plain futures-and-Treasuries commodity fund does not carry.

Full ACOM profile⁠

Full CMDT profile⁠

ACOM vs CMDT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACOM vs CMDT Cost

Overpaying ACOM vs CMDT

$4,822

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACOM 0.93%

    $17,539

  • CMDT 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACOM 0.93%
  • CMDT 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ACOM $17,539CMDT $12,717

Year by year

YearACOMCMDTOverpaying
10$1,644$1,163$481
20$6,199$4,440$1,759
30$17,539$12,717$4,822

Expense ratio

  • 0.93%ACOM
  • 0.65%CMDT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.79%

CMDT 6th cheapest of 13 funds

ACOM 10th cheapest of 13 funds

ACOM vs CMDT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACOM No data
CMDT 12.09%
Payout (12M)
ACOM None
CMDT $3.83
Last payment
ACOM No data
CMDT $3.20
Ex-dividend
ACOM No data
CMDT Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
ACOM No data
CMDT Oct 5, 2026
Frequency
ACOM No data
CMDT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ACOMAll ACOM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CMDTQuarterly · 15 paymentsAll CMDT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jul 3, 2023 $0.03; Oct 2, 2023 $0.32; Dec 11, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.31; Apr 1, 2024 $0.27; Jul 1, 2024 $0.26; Oct 1, 2024 $0.76; Dec 31, 2024 $0.93; Apr 1, 2025 $0.20; Jul 1, 2025 $0.21; Oct 1, 2025 $0.21; Dec 31, 2025 $0.22; Apr 1, 2026 $0.19; Jul 1, 2026 $0.22; Oct 1, 2026 $3.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD

ACOM vs CMDT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACOM No dataCMDT 11.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACOM No dataCMDT 0.83
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACOM No dataCMDT −13.2%since May 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACOM 1.46CMDT 0.78

Popular comparisons

  • ACOMCvsPDBCA

    Harbor Active Commodity ETF · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsPDBCA

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACOMCvsSOYBB

    Harbor Active Commodity ETF · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsSOYBB

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACOMCvsWEATB

    Harbor Active Commodity ETF · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsWEATB

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.