WEAT ranks 2nd and ACOM 7th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
ACOM vs WEAT
WEAT −0.31pt a year
0.93%0.62%
WEAT 828.8×the volume
649538K
ACOM vs WEAT Performance
+11.7%−6.8%
- ACOM 0.93%
- WEAT 0.62%, better
- ACOM $7M
- WEAT $234M
- ACOM
- WEAT +4.7%
- ACOM 26
- WEAT 31
- ACOM 649 sh
- WEAT 538K sh, better
- ACOM $24.37
- WEAT $22.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACOM | WEAT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A76Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A98Higher | D26 |
| Tradability | D30 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D31 | B61Higher |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. ACOM and WEAT are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACOMC
WEATB
In short
ACOM Most commodity ETFs bolt themselves to a fixed index. This one hands the wheel to Quantix, an ex-Goldman commodities team, to actively trade futures, options and swaps, with the Quantix Commodity Index as the yardstick.
WEAT Wheat, straight up. Since 2011 this Teucrium fund has given brokerage-account investors pure-play exposure to CBOT wheat futures, laddered across three contract months rather than piled into the front month.
Stated mandate
ACOM The Fund seeks commodity-market exposure through actively managed commodity instruments, including futures, options, over-the-counter swaps, and other commodity-linked derivatives. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in instruments providing commodity exposure.
WEAT The fund seeks cost-effective price exposure to the wheat market through futures for future delivery.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACOM vs WEAT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACOM vs WEAT Cost
Overpaying ACOM vs WEAT
$5,360
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACOM 0.93%
$17,539
WEAT 0.62%
$12,179
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACOM | WEAT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $1,111 | $533 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $4,246 | $1,953 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $12,179 | $5,360 |
- 0.93%ACOM
- 0.62%WEAT, cheaper
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
WEAT 4th cheapest of 13 funds
ACOM 10th cheapest of 13 funds
ACOM vs WEAT Dividends
- ACOM None
- WEAT None
Distribution history
ACOM vs WEAT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACOM WEAT 22.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACOM WEAT −0.46
- Worst fall
- ACOM WEAT −67.8%
- Market sensitivity
- ACOM 1.46WEAT 0.68
ACOM and WEAT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


