USG ranks 5th and ACOM 7th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
ACOM vs USG
USG −0.48pt a year
0.93%0.45%
USG 6.5×the volume
6494.23K
ACOM vs USG Performance
+11.7%−6.9%
- ACOM 0.93%
- USG 0.45%, better
- ACOM $7M
- USG $9M
- ACOM
- USG −6.4%
- ACOM
- USG 32.00%
- ACOM 26
- USG 3
- ACOM 649 sh
- USG 4.23K sh, better
- ACOM $24.37
- USG $29.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACOM | USG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A99Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A98Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | D30Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D31 | D39Higher |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. ACOM and USG are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACOMC
USGB
In short
ACOM Most commodity ETFs bolt themselves to a fixed index. This one hands the wheel to Quantix, an ex-Goldman commodities team, to actively trade futures, options and swaps, with the Quantix Commodity Index as the yardstick.
USG Gold with a paycheck attached. USG holds claims on real gold bars plus collateralized futures, sells call options against that gold, and distributes quarterly, at one of the lowest fees in the commodity-futures crowd.
Stated mandate
ACOM The Fund seeks commodity-market exposure through actively managed commodity instruments, including futures, options, over-the-counter swaps, and other commodity-linked derivatives. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in instruments providing commodity exposure.
USG The Fund seeks long-term results that generally correspond to gold-price performance while generating dividend income from selling gold call options and collateral interest. It obtains gold exposure through gold warrants, collateralized futures, and related derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACOM vs USG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACOM vs USG Cost
Overpaying ACOM vs USG
$8,498
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACOM 0.93%
$17,539
USG 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACOM | USG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,644 | $812 | $832 |
| 20 | $6,199 | $3,128 | $3,071 |
| 30 | $17,539 | $9,041 | $8,498 |
- 0.93%ACOM
- 0.45%USG, cheaper
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
USG cheapest of 13 funds
ACOM 10th cheapest of 13 funds
ACOM vs USG Dividends
- ACOM
- USG 32.00%
- ACOM None
- USG $9.52
- ACOM
- USG $0.17
- ACOM
- USG Sep 21, 2026
- ACOM
- USG Sep 23, 2026
- ACOM
- USG Quarterly
Distribution history
ACOM vs USG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACOM USG 17.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACOM USG 0.87
- Worst fall
- ACOM USG −28.8%
- Market sensitivity
- ACOM 1.46USG 0.28
Popular comparisons
- 0.93% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.