Skip to content

ACOM vs USG

Harbor Active Commodity ETF

ACOMCNYSE Arca

USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund

USGBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

USG −0.48pt a year

ACOM0.93%USG0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

USG 6.5×the volume

ACOM649USG4.23K

ACOM vs USG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.7%ACOM−6.9%USG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ACOM +11.7%. USG −6.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ACOM 0.93%
USG 0.45%, better
Fund size
ACOM $7M
USG $9M
1Y total return
ACOM No data
USG −6.4%
Yield (12M)
ACOM No data
USG 32.00%
Holdings
ACOM 26
USG 3
Avg volume (30D)
ACOM 649 sh
USG 4.23K sh, better
NAV per share
ACOM $24.37
USG $29.84
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACOM: Cost 23, Risk 98, Mission not scored, Tradability 30, Holdings not scored, Durability 31. USG: Cost 99, Risk 32, Mission not scored, Tradability 27, Holdings not scored, Durability 39.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACOM, USG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACOMUSG
Cost30% weightF23A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA98HigherD32
Tradability15% weightD30HigherD27
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD31D39Higher

Rank among Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACOM and USG are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 13 funds
See all 13 ›

USG ranks 5th and ACOM 7th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 4BCMDTPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded FundScore 64
  2. Rank 5BUSGUSCF Gold Strategy Plus Income FundScore 62
  3. Rank 6BDBBInvesco DB Base Metals FundScore 61
  4. Rank 7CACOMHarbor Active Commodity ETFScore 42
  5. Rank 7CHARDSimplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACOMCHarbor Active Commodity ETF

USGBUSCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund

In short

ACOM Most commodity ETFs bolt themselves to a fixed index. This one hands the wheel to Quantix, an ex-Goldman commodities team, to actively trade futures, options and swaps, with the Quantix Commodity Index as the yardstick.

USG Gold with a paycheck attached. USG holds claims on real gold bars plus collateralized futures, sells call options against that gold, and distributes quarterly, at one of the lowest fees in the commodity-futures crowd.

Stated mandate

ACOM The Fund seeks commodity-market exposure through actively managed commodity instruments, including futures, options, over-the-counter swaps, and other commodity-linked derivatives. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in instruments providing commodity exposure.

USG The Fund seeks long-term results that generally correspond to gold-price performance while generating dividend income from selling gold call options and collateral interest. It obtains gold exposure through gold warrants, collateralized futures, and related derivatives.

Why people hold it

  • ACOM Genuinely active, not index-plus: the subadviser picks and sizes futures, options and OTC swaps across commodity markets rather than following set index weights.nasdaqtrader.comharborcapital.com
  • The bench behind it: Quantix is led by CIO Don Casturo, formerly Goldman Sachs' global commodities COO, and the same shop runs Harbor's index-based commodity ETF and built the Quantix Commodity Index.harborcapital.comharborcapital.com 2
  • Built as a 1940 Act fund, with commodity derivatives routed through a wholly owned Cayman subsidiary, the standard plumbing for keeping this exposure inside fund tax rules.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • The mandate has guardrails: at least 80% of net assets must sit in commodity-exposure instruments, so it stays a commodity fund however the manager shifts between markets.nasdaqtrader.com
  • USG At 0.45% a year it charges well under the 0.79% cohort median, and less than top-ranked commodity peers PDBC, SOYB and WEAT.
  • Gold that throws off cash: the fund writes call options against its gold exposure and earns collateral interest, then pays shareholders quarterly.uscfinvestments.com
  • Exposure comes via COMEX gold warrants (ownership claims on bars in licensed depositories) and fully collateralized futures, actively run through a Cayman subsidiary capped at 25% of assets.alpsinc.com
  • USCF states the fund delivers its gold-plus-income strategy without a K-1, sparing the tax-form headache common to commodity products.uscfinvestments.comalpsinc.com

Worth knowing

  • ACOM Active discretion carries a price: 0.93% a year, above the median for futures-based commodity funds, several of which run cheaper index strategies (PDBC at 0.74%).
  • It launched in 2026, so there is no long public record for the strategy in this wrapper, and it remains small and thinly traded next to the category's established names.harborcapital.com
  • Returns come from a derivatives book, not a coupon: commodity futures and swaps can move sharply, and the fund has not been paying distributions.harborcapital.com
  • USG Covered calls swap upside for income. Above the strike plus premium collected, further gold gains go to the option buyer, while the fund keeps the downside if gold slides.alpsinc.com
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than on the household-name gold ETFs.
  • Payouts can include return of capital, meaning part of a distribution may be capital coming back rather than income the fund earned.

Full ACOM profile⁠

Full USG profile⁠

ACOM vs USG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACOM vs USG Cost

Overpaying ACOM vs USG

$8,498

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACOM 0.93%

    $17,539

  • USG 0.45%

    $9,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACOM 0.93%
  • USG 0.45%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ACOM $17,539USG $9,041

Year by year

YearACOMUSGOverpaying
10$1,644$812$832
20$6,199$3,128$3,071
30$17,539$9,041$8,498

Expense ratio

  • 0.93%ACOM
  • 0.45%USG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.79%

USG cheapest of 13 funds

ACOM 10th cheapest of 13 funds

ACOM vs USG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACOM No data
USG 32.00%
Payout (12M)
ACOM None
USG $9.52
Last payment
ACOM No data
USG $0.17
Ex-dividend
ACOM No data
USG Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
ACOM No data
USG Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
ACOM No data
USG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

ACOMAll ACOM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

USGQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll USG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2022 $0.17; Sep 27, 2022 $0.44; Dec 27, 2022 $0.12; Mar 21, 2023 $0.18; Jun 20, 2023 $0.26; Sep 19, 2023 $0.84; Dec 19, 2023 $0.80; Mar 19, 2024 $0.17; Jun 20, 2024 $0.09; Sep 20, 2024 $1.59; Dec 23, 2024 $0.33; Mar 19, 2025 $0.16; Jun 20, 2025 $0.21; Sep 22, 2025 $0.21; Dec 22, 2025 $8.92; Mar 20, 2026 $0.19; Jun 18, 2026 $0.25; Sep 21, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1020232026YTD

ACOM vs USG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACOM No dataUSG 17.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACOM No dataUSG 0.87
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACOM No dataUSG −28.8%since Nov 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACOM 1.46USG 0.28

Popular comparisons

  • ACOMCvsPDBCA

    Harbor Active Commodity ETF · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USGBvsPDBCA

    USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACOMCvsSOYBB

    Harbor Active Commodity ETF · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USGBvsSOYBB

    USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACOMCvsWEATB

    Harbor Active Commodity ETF · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.93% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • USGBvsWEATB

    USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.