Skip to content
etf.net

AEMG vs GUSE

Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Growth ETF

AEMG—NYSE Arca

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Overlap

2.6%by weight

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.08pt a year

AEMG0.38%GUSE0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 14.5×the volume

AEMG2.23KGUSE32.3K

AEMG vs GUSE Performance

Oct 6, 2026 – Nov 6, 2026

−13.6%AEMG−5.9%GUSE

Oct 6, 2026 to Nov 6, 2026. AEMG −13.6%. GUSE −5.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−7.5%−2.5%0%Oct 6Oct 21Nov 6
Expense ratio
AEMG 0.38%
GUSE 0.30%, better
Fund size
AEMG $2M
GUSE $409M
Holdings
AEMG 123
GUSE 122
Avg volume (30D)
AEMG 2.23K sh
GUSE 32.3K sh, better
NAV per share
AEMG $17.49
GUSE $43.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —AEMGNot yet graded
GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 95, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 85, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for AEMG, GUSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAEMGGUSE
Cost30% weightNot scoredA97
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightNot scoredA95
Tradability15% weightNot scoredC46
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA85
Durability5% weightNot scoredA85

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 83
  4. AEMGNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AEMG—Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Growth ETF

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

In short

AEMG No data

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

Stated mandate

AEMG No data

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

Why people hold it

AEMG No data

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

Worth knowing

AEMG No data

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

Full AEMG profile⁠

Full GUSE profile⁠

AEMG vs GUSE Holdings

How AEMG and GUSE differ

Overlap by weight

2.6%

Shared holdings make up 12.3% of AEMG and 2.6% of GUSE.

Level by level

  • Holdings8 in both2.6%
  • Sector11 Sectors84.5%
  • Countryby domicile97.3%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in AEMG and GUSE, widest gap first
SectorMore in AEMGMore in GUSEGap
Health CareAEMG +5.6 points
IndustrialsAEMG +5.2 points
FinancialsGUSE +5.0 points
CommunicationGUSE +4.5 points
Consumer StaplesGUSE +3.9 points
TechnologyAEMG +2.4 points
Consumer DiscretionaryAEMG +2.1 points
UtilitiesGUSE +1.4 points
MaterialsGUSE +0.3 points
EnergyAEMG +0.3 points
Real EstateGUSE +0.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AEMG and GUSE, widest gap first
CountryMore in AEMGMore in GUSEGap
United StatesGUSE +2.1 points
SwitzerlandAEMG +1.0 points
ChinaAEMG +1.0 points
TaiwanGUSE +0.6 points
Other countries (2)AEMG +0.7 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • AEMG26.1%
  • GUSE35.2%

Securities held

  • AEMG123
  • GUSE121

Asset class

AEMG
Stocks
GUSE
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in AEMG115
  • In both8
  • Only in GUSE113

Only in AEMG

115 securities, 87.7% of AEMG by weight

  • Comfort Systems Usa Inc3.75%
  • Marathon Petroleum Corp3.39%
  • Ameriprise Financial Inc2.97%

Only in GUSE

113 securities, 95.4% of GUSE by weight

  • NVIDIA Corporation6.75%
  • Apple Inc.5.33%
  • Microsoft Corporation5.30%

Weight gaps

All 8 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in AEMG and GUSE, widest gap first
HoldingMore in AEMGMore in GUSEGap
Snowflake IncSNOWAEMG +2.92 points
Datadog Inc - Class ADDOGAEMG +1.83 points
Dexcom IncDXCMAEMG +1.72 points
Teradyne IncTERAEMG +1.49 points
Netapp IncNTAPAEMG +1.05 points
Tapestry IncTPRAEMG +0.37 points
Jabil IncJBLAEMG +0.22 points
Hewlett Packard EnterpriseHPEAEMG +0.06 points

All 125 AEMG holdings⁠All 121 GUSE holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AEMG vs GUSE Cost

Overpaying AEMG vs GUSE

$1,557

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AEMG 0.38%

    $7,706

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AEMG 0.38%
  • GUSE 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530AEMG $7,706GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearAEMGGUSEOverpaying
10$688$545$143
20$2,658$2,113$545
30$7,706$6,149$1,557

Expense ratio

  • 0.38%AEMG
  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

AEMG 10th cheapest of 90 funds

AEMG vs GUSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 6, 2026
Payout (12M)
AEMG None
GUSE No data
Last payment
AEMG No data
GUSE $0.30
Ex-dividend
AEMG No data
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
AEMG No data
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
AEMG No data
GUSE Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

AEMGAll AEMG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

AEMG vs GUSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AEMG 0.00GUSE 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • AEMG—vsJUSAA

    Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AEMG—vsLRGCA

    Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AEMG—vsFELGA

    Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.