Skip to content
etf.net

AEMG vs LRGC

Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Growth ETF

AEMG—NYSE Arca

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGCANYSE Arca

Overlap

1.2%by weight

Expense ratio

AEMG −0.01pt a year

AEMG0.38%LRGC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

LRGC 15.2×the volume

AEMG2.23KLRGC34K

AEMG vs LRGC Performance

Oct 6, 2026 – Nov 6, 2026

−13.6%AEMG−4.8%LRGC

Oct 6, 2026 to Nov 6, 2026. AEMG −13.6%. LRGC −4.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−7.5%−2.5%0%Oct 6Oct 21Nov 6
Expense ratio
AEMG 0.38%, better
LRGC 0.39%
Fund size
AEMG $2M
LRGC $1.33B
1Y total return
AEMG No data
LRGC +9.5%
Yield (12M)
AEMG No data
LRGC 0.54%
Holdings
AEMG 123
LRGC 72
Avg volume (30D)
AEMG 2.23K sh
LRGC 34K sh, better
NAV per share
AEMG $17.49
LRGC $83.23
52W range

ETF.net Grade

  • —AEMGNot yet graded
LRGC: Cost 82, Risk 92, Mission 79, Tradability 86, Holdings 77, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for AEMG, LRGC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAEMGLRGC
Cost30% weightNot scoredA82
Mission25% weightNot scoredA79
Risk15% weightNot scoredA92
Tradability15% weightNot scoredA86
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA77
Durability5% weightNot scoredA79

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

LRGC ranks 3rd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 83
  4. Rank 4AFELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETFScore 80
  5. AEMGNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AEMG—Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Growth ETF

LRGCAAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

In short

AEMG No data

LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.

Stated mandate

AEMG No data

LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

AEMG No data

  • LRGC Roughly 70 holdings against a 500-stock yardstick, with quality and value screens doing the filtering. Each name actually carries weight.
  • 0.39% a year sits below the median fee in its active large-cap group, so the manager isn't digging out of a deep cost hole.
  • One of the stronger implementations among the actively managed US large-cap funds we track, with a plain mandate: at least 80% of net assets in large-cap US equities.
  • Launched in 2023 on one of AB's core US equity strategies, with Jane Street signed on as lead market maker from day one.prnewswire.com

Worth knowing

AEMG No data

  • LRGC At 0.39%, it costs more than cheaper enhanced-index rivals in the same group, such as JUSA at 0.12% and GUSE at 0.30%.
  • Outcomes ride on the team's judgment, not an index rulebook, and about 70 positions concentrate those calls.
  • It trades lightly next to the big index names, so spreads can run wider, especially in fast markets.

Full AEMG profile⁠

Full LRGC profile⁠

AEMG vs LRGC Holdings

How AEMG and LRGC differ

Overlap by weight

1.2%

Shared holdings make up 1.4% of LRGC and 1.2% of AEMG.

Level by level

  • Holdings3 in both1.2%
  • Sector11 Sectors85.2%
  • Countryby domicile97.0%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in AEMG and LRGC, widest gap first
SectorMore in AEMGMore in LRGCGap
CommunicationLRGC +6.7 points
FinancialsLRGC +5.0 points
Health CareAEMG +4.7 points
Consumer DiscretionaryAEMG +3.5 points
TechnologyAEMG +2.7 points
IndustrialsAEMG +2.2 points
Consumer StaplesLRGC +1.9 points
UtilitiesLRGC +1.0 points
EnergyAEMG +0.9 points
MaterialsAEMG +0.8 points
Real EstateLRGC +0.2 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AEMG and LRGC, widest gap first
CountryMore in AEMGMore in LRGCGap
NetherlandsLRGC +1.2 points
TaiwanLRGC +1.0 points
SwitzerlandAEMG +1.0 points
ChinaAEMG +1.0 points
CanadaLRGC +0.8 points
United StatesAEMG +0.6 points
Other countries (2)AEMG +0.4 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • AEMG26.1%
  • LRGC42.8%

Securities held

  • AEMG123
  • LRGC71

Asset class

AEMG
Stocks
LRGC
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in AEMG120
  • In both3
  • Only in LRGC68

Only in AEMG

120 securities, 98.8% of AEMG by weight

  • Comfort Systems Usa Inc3.75%
  • Marathon Petroleum Corp3.39%
  • Snowflake Inc3.16%

Only in LRGC

68 securities, 98.5% of LRGC by weight

  • Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.000006257.22%
  • NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.0016.82%
  • Apple Inc Common Stock USD.000016.13%

Weight gaps

All 3 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in AEMG and LRGC, widest gap first
HoldingMore in AEMGMore in LRGCGap
Keysight Technologies InKEYSLRGC +0.18 points
Dynatrace IncDTLRGC +0.03 points
United Rentals IncURILRGC +0.01 points

All 125 AEMG holdings⁠All 71 LRGC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AEMG vs LRGC Cost

Overpaying LRGC vs AEMG

$192

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AEMG 0.38%

    $7,706

  • LRGC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AEMG 0.38%
  • LRGC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530LRGC $7,898AEMG $7,706

Year by year

YearAEMGLRGCOverpaying
10$688$705$17
20$2,658$2,725$67
30$7,706$7,898$192

Expense ratio

  • 0.38%AEMG, cheaper
  • 0.39%LRGC
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

AEMG 10th cheapest of 90 funds

LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds

AEMG vs LRGC Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 6, 2026
Yield (12M)
AEMG No data
LRGC 0.54%
Payout (12M)
AEMG None
LRGC $0.45
Last payment
AEMG No data
LRGC $0.45
Ex-dividend
AEMG No data
LRGC Dec 17, 2025
Paid on
AEMG No data
LRGC Dec 18, 2025
Frequency
AEMG No data
LRGC Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

AEMGAll AEMG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

LRGCAnnual · 3 paymentsAll LRGC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 8, 2023 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Dec 17, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

AEMG vs LRGC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AEMG No dataLRGC 12.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AEMG No dataLRGC 1.26
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AEMG No dataLRGC −19.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AEMG 0.00LRGC 1.00

AEMG and LRGC in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • AEMG—vsJUSAA

    Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsJUSAA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AEMG—vsGUSEA

    Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Growth ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsGUSEA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AEMG—vsFELGA

    Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.38% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • LRGCAvsFELGA

    AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.