FELG ranks 4th and AFGR 48th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
AFGR vs FELG
FELG −0.47pt a year
0.65%0.18%
FELG 54.2×the volume
6.99K379K
AFGR vs FELG Performance
−2.2%−0.6%
- AFGR 0.65%
- FELG 0.18%, better
- AFGR $86M
- FELG $5.78B
- AFGR
- FELG −0.5%
- AFGR 0.01%
- FELG 0.37%, better
- AFGR 91
- FELG 133
- AFGR 6.99K sh
- FELG 379K sh, better
- AFGR $35.69
- FELG $42.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AFGR | FELG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | C44 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | A77Higher | C52 |
| Durability | A71 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. AFGR and FELG are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AFGRC
FELGA
In short
AFGR An active quant screen aimed at large-cap growth: names are ranked on growth, momentum and quality, landing on roughly 90 stocks. Rules-driven stock picking rather than a star manager's convictions.
FELG Active stock-picking on an index-fund budget. FELG charges 0.18% to tilt around the Russell 1000 Growth Index rather than copy it, running a strategy whose track record dates to 2007.
Stated mandate
AFGR The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large-capitalization growth companies.
FELG The fund seeks capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AFGR vs FELG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AFGR vs FELG Cost
Overpaying AFGR vs FELG
$8,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AFGR 0.65%
$12,717
FELG 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AFGR | FELG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $328 | $835 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $1,281 | $3,159 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $3,749 | $8,968 |
- 0.65%AFGR
- 0.18%FELG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
FELG cheapest of 90 funds
AFGR 65th cheapest of 90 funds
AFGR vs FELG Dividends
- AFGR 0.01%
- FELG 0.37%, better
- AFGR $0.0052
- FELG $0.16
- AFGR $0.0052
- FELG $0.04
- AFGR Sep 24, 2026
- FELG Sep 18, 2026
- AFGR Sep 30, 2026
- FELG Sep 22, 2026
- AFGR Irregular
- FELG Quarterly
Distribution history
AFGR vs FELG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AFGR FELG 16.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- AFGR FELG 0.93
- Worst fall
- AFGR FELG −23.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AFGR 1.27FELG 1.23
AFGR and FELG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
