JUSA ranks 1st and AFGR 48th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
AFGR vs JUSA
JUSA −0.47pt a year
0.65%0.18%
JUSA 14.1×the volume
6.99K98.8K
AFGR vs JUSA Performance
−2.2%+0.5%
- AFGR 0.65%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- AFGR $86M
- JUSA $745M
- AFGR
- JUSA +10.8%
- AFGR 0.01%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- AFGR 91
- JUSA 263
- AFGR 6.99K sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- AFGR $35.69
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AFGR | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | B66 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | A77 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A71 | A76Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. AFGR and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AFGRC
JUSAA
In short
AFGR An active quant screen aimed at large-cap growth: names are ranked on growth, momentum and quality, landing on roughly 90 stocks. Rules-driven stock picking rather than a star manager's convictions.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
AFGR The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large-capitalization growth companies.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AFGR vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AFGR vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying AFGR vs JUSA
$8,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AFGR 0.65%
$12,717
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AFGR | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $328 | $835 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $1,281 | $3,159 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $3,749 | $8,968 |
- 0.65%AFGR
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
AFGR 65th cheapest of 90 funds
AFGR vs JUSA Dividends
- AFGR 0.01%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- AFGR $0.0052
- JUSA $0.49
- AFGR $0.0052
- JUSA $0.13
- AFGR Sep 24, 2026
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- AFGR Sep 30, 2026
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- AFGR Irregular
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
AFGR vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AFGR JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AFGR JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- AFGR JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- AFGR 1.27JUSA 0.98
AFGR and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

