AGNG ranks 2nd and COPJ 17th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
AGNG vs COPJ
AGNG −0.25pt a year
0.50%0.75%
COPJ 6.6×the volume
10.4K69.2K
COPJ +24.4pt
+17.7%+42.1%
AGNG vs COPJ Performance
+18.0%+14.3%
- AGNG 0.50%, better
- COPJ 0.75%
- AGNG $96M
- COPJ $130M
- AGNG +18.0%, better
- COPJ +14.3%
- AGNG 0.83%
- COPJ 12.32%, better
- AGNG 87
- COPJ 69
- AGNG 10.4K sh
- COPJ 69.2K sh, better
- AGNG $39.56
- COPJ $37.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGNG | COPJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B67Higher | F19 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A80Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B62 |
| Durability | A74Higher | C51 |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. AGNG and COPJ are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGNGA
COPJD
In short
AGNG AGNG plays the one trend nobody needs a crystal ball for: people getting older. About 80 developed-market names in medical devices, pharma and senior living, wrapped around an aging-population index, for 0.50% a year.
COPJ Most copper ETFs buy the giants already digging. COPJ goes upstream to the juniors: roughly 70 explorers and development-stage miners, picked by a Sprott-built Nasdaq index rather than a manager's hunches.
Stated mandate
AGNG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.
COPJ The fund targets small copper miners in exploration and development stages, seeking exposure to their potential revenue and asset growth. Before fees and expenses, it seeks returns generally corresponding to the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGNG vs COPJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGNG vs COPJ Cost
Overpaying COPJ vs AGNG
$4,503
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGNG 0.50%
$9,979
COPJ 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGNG | COPJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,336 | $436 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,078 | $1,618 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $14,482 | $4,503 |
- 0.50%AGNG, cheaper
- 0.75%COPJ
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
AGNG 7th cheapest of 18 funds
COPJ 14th cheapest of 18 funds
AGNG vs COPJ Dividends
- AGNG 0.83%
- COPJ 12.32%, better
- AGNG $0.33
- COPJ $4.55
- AGNG $0.16
- COPJ $4.55
- AGNG Jun 29, 2026
- COPJ Dec 18, 2025
- AGNG Jul 7, 2026
- COPJ Dec 22, 2025
- AGNG Twice a year
- COPJ Annual
Distribution history
AGNG vs COPJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGNG 13.1%, betterCOPJ 32.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- AGNG 0.98COPJ 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- AGNG −23.9%COPJ −32.3%
- Market sensitivity
- AGNG 0.60COPJ 1.33
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.