WRND ranks 3rd and COPJ 17th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
COPJ vs WRND
WRND −0.57pt a year
0.75%0.18%
COPJ 130.0×the volume
69.2K532
COPJ +19.5pt
+42.1%+22.6%
COPJ vs WRND Performance
+14.3%+9.3%
- COPJ 0.75%
- WRND 0.18%, better
- COPJ $130M
- WRND $11M
- COPJ +14.3%, better
- WRND +9.3%
- COPJ 12.32%, better
- WRND 0.97%
- COPJ 69
- WRND 208
- COPJ 69.2K sh, better
- WRND 532 sh
- COPJ $37.27
- WRND $40.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COPJ | WRND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D32 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | C46Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | B62Higher | B58 |
| Durability | C51Higher | C47 |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. COPJ and WRND are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COPJD
WRNDB
In short
COPJ Most copper ETFs buy the giants already digging. COPJ goes upstream to the juniors: roughly 70 explorers and development-stage miners, picked by a Sprott-built Nasdaq index rather than a manager's hunches.
WRND Most innovation funds sell you a story. WRND buys receipts: roughly 200 companies worldwide picked on what they actually spend on R&D and whether that spending earns a return, at a fee well under the thematic norm.
Stated mandate
COPJ The fund targets small copper miners in exploration and development stages, seeking exposure to their potential revenue and asset growth. Before fees and expenses, it seeks returns generally corresponding to the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index.
WRND The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index. Its passive strategy targets innovative companies worldwide based on high research and development spending.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COPJ vs WRND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COPJ vs WRND Cost
Overpaying COPJ vs WRND
$10,733
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COPJ 0.75%
$14,482
WRND 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COPJ | WRND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $328 | $1,008 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $1,281 | $3,797 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $3,749 | $10,733 |
- 0.75%COPJ
- 0.18%WRND, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
WRND cheapest of 18 funds
COPJ 14th cheapest of 18 funds
COPJ vs WRND Dividends
- COPJ 12.32%, better
- WRND 0.97%
- COPJ $4.55
- WRND $0.40
- COPJ $4.55
- WRND $0.10
- COPJ Dec 18, 2025
- WRND Sep 30, 2026
- COPJ Dec 22, 2025
- WRND Oct 2, 2026
- COPJ Annual
- WRND Quarterly
Distribution history
COPJ vs WRND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COPJ 32.8%WRND 14.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- COPJ 1.11WRND 1.18, better
- Worst fall
- COPJ −32.3%WRND −27.2%
- Market sensitivity
- COPJ 1.33WRND 1.15
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.