Skip to content
etf.net

AGNG vs COPP

Global X Aging Population ETF

AGNGANasdaq

Sprott Copper Miners ETF

COPPDNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

AGNG −0.16pt a year

AGNG0.50%COPP0.66%

Avg volume · 30D

COPP 8.3×the volume

AGNG10.3KCOPP86.1K

AGNG vs COPP Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+21.2%AGNG+33.3%COPP

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. AGNG +21.2%. COPP +33.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%60%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
AGNG 0.50%, better
COPP 0.66%
Fund size
AGNG $98M
COPP $234M
1Y total return
AGNG +21.2%
COPP +33.3%, better
Yield (12M)
AGNG 0.80%
COPP 2.20%, better
Holdings
AGNG 86
COPP 80
Avg volume (30D)
AGNG 10.3K sh
COPP 86.1K sh, better
NAV per share
AGNG $40.20
COPP $35.48
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AGNG: Cost 65, Risk 86, Mission not scored, Tradability 61, Holdings 74, Durability 73. COPP: Cost 35, Risk 29, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings 21, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for AGNG, COPP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAGNGCOPP
Cost30% weightB65HigherD35
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA86HigherD29
Tradability15% weightB61HigherB60
Holdings10% weightA74HigherF21
Durability5% weightA73HigherC49

Rank among Global Thematic funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AGNG and COPP are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

AGNG ranks 2nd and COPP 14th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 3BICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETFScore 68
  4. Rank 13DPRNTThe 3D Printing ETFScore 39
  5. Rank 14DCOPPSprott Copper Miners ETFScore 38
  6. Rank 15DAWAYAmplify Travel Tech ETFScore 35

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AGNGAGlobal X Aging Population ETF

COPPDSprott Copper Miners ETF

In short

AGNG AGNG plays the one trend nobody needs a crystal ball for: people getting older. About 80 developed-market names in medical devices, pharma and senior living, wrapped around an aging-population index, for 0.50% a year.

COPP Copper's electrification story played through the shovels, not the metal. COPP indexes roughly 80 miners worldwide, the broad half of Sprott's two-lane copper shelf.

Stated mandate

AGNG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.

COPP The fund seeks, before fees and expenses, to generally match the total-return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Copper MinersTM Index.

Why people hold it

  • AGNG One ticket on the demographics trade: roughly 80 developed-market companies tied to older consumers, tracking the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.globalxetfs.com
  • 0.50% a year, below the median fee in its global thematic peer group. Niche themes usually charge a premium for the privilege.
  • Running since 2016, so the theme has a long live record rather than a backtest and a pitch deck.
  • Portfolio construction and risk profile put it among the stronger builds in its global thematic peer group.
  • COPP Rules-based, not stock-picked: it tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index across roughly 80 miners globally.sprott.com
  • At 0.66%, it prices right at the middle of the copper-miner shelf. No surcharge for the specialist wrapper.
  • Sprott runs copper in two lanes: COPP for the broad miner index, COPJ for the juniors. You pick the risk end instead of taking a blend.

Worth knowing

  • AGNG Thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than in mega-cap funds and how you place the order matters more.
  • One theme, tilted to healthcare and developed markets, so its path can look nothing like a broad global index.
  • Distributions arrive annually or semiannually, not monthly, and the asset base is modest by ETF standards.
  • COPP It launched in 2024, so the track record does not yet cover a full copper cycle.
  • Cheaper doors into the theme exist: ICOP lists at 0.47% and COPX at 0.65%.
  • One metal, one sector: it rises and falls with copper miners, and cash comes back once or twice a year at most, not monthly.

Full AGNG profile⁠

Full COPP profile⁠

AGNG vs COPP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AGNG vs COPP Cost

Overpaying COPP vs AGNG

$2,917

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AGNG 0.50%

    $9,979

  • COPP 0.66%

    $12,896

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AGNG 0.50%
  • COPP 0.66%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530COPP $12,896AGNG $9,979

Year by year

YearAGNGCOPPOverpaying
10$900$1,180$280
20$3,460$4,504$1,044
30$9,979$12,896$2,917

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%AGNG, cheaper
  • 0.66%COPP
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

AGNG 7th cheapest of 18 funds

COPP 12th cheapest of 18 funds

AGNG vs COPP Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
AGNG 0.80%
COPP 2.20%, better
Payout (12M)
AGNG $0.33
COPP $0.82
Last payment
AGNG $0.16
COPP $0.82
Ex-dividend
AGNG Jun 29, 2026
COPP Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
AGNG Jul 7, 2026
COPP Dec 22, 2025
Frequency
AGNG Twice a year
COPP Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AGNGTwice a year · 17 paymentsAll AGNG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 17 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.20; Dec 28, 2018 $0.19; Jun 27, 2019 $0.05; Dec 30, 2019 $0.14; Jun 29, 2020 $0.04; Dec 30, 2020 $0.05; Jun 29, 2021 $0.03; Dec 30, 2021 $0.17; Jun 29, 2022 $0.11; Dec 29, 2022 $0.02; Jun 29, 2023 $0.15; Dec 28, 2023 $0.12; Jun 27, 2024 $0.10; Dec 30, 2024 $0.15; Jun 27, 2025 $0.14; Dec 30, 2025 $0.17; Jun 29, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
COPPIrregular · 2 paymentsAll COPP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 12, 2024 $0.53; Dec 18, 2025 $0.82. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

AGNG vs COPP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AGNG 13.1%COPP 32.7%since Apr 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AGNG 0.98COPP 0.61since Apr 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AGNG −23.2%COPP −44.3%since Mar 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AGNG 0.59COPP 0.95

AGNG and COPP in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • AGNGAvsFITEA

    Global X Aging Population ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • COPPDvsFITEA

    Sprott Copper Miners ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AGNGAvsICOPB

    Global X Aging Population ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • COPPDvsICOPB

    Sprott Copper Miners ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AGNGAvsWRNDB

    Global X Aging Population ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • COPPDvsWRNDB

    Sprott Copper Miners ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.