WRND ranks 3rd and COPP 14th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
COPP vs WRND
WRND −0.48pt a year
0.66%0.18%
COPP 156.9×the volume
86.1K549
COPP vs WRND Performance
+33.3%+10.6%
- COPP 0.66%
- WRND 0.18%, better
- COPP $234M
- WRND $10M
- COPP +33.3%, better
- WRND +10.6%
- COPP 2.20%, better
- WRND 0.99%
- COPP 80
- WRND 209
- COPP 86.1K sh, better
- WRND 549 sh
- COPP $35.48
- WRND $38.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COPP | WRND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D29 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | B60Higher | F19 |
| Holdings | F21 | B57Higher |
| Durability | C49Higher | C47 |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. COPP and WRND are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COPPD
WRNDB
In short
COPP Copper's electrification story played through the shovels, not the metal. COPP indexes roughly 80 miners worldwide, the broad half of Sprott's two-lane copper shelf.
WRND Most innovation funds sell you a story. WRND buys receipts: roughly 200 companies worldwide picked on what they actually spend on R&D and whether that spending earns a return, at a fee well under the thematic norm.
Stated mandate
COPP The fund seeks, before fees and expenses, to generally match the total-return performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Copper MinersTM Index.
WRND The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index. Its passive strategy targets innovative companies worldwide based on high research and development spending.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COPP vs WRND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COPP vs WRND Cost
Overpaying COPP vs WRND
$9,147
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COPP 0.66%
$12,896
WRND 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COPP | WRND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $328 | $852 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $1,281 | $3,223 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $3,749 | $9,147 |
- 0.66%COPP
- 0.18%WRND, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
WRND cheapest of 18 funds
COPP 12th cheapest of 18 funds
COPP vs WRND Dividends
- COPP 2.20%, better
- WRND 0.99%
- COPP $0.82
- WRND $0.40
- COPP $0.82
- WRND $0.10
- COPP Dec 18, 2025
- WRND Sep 30, 2026
- COPP Dec 22, 2025
- WRND Oct 2, 2026
- COPP Irregular
- WRND Quarterly
Distribution history
COPP vs WRND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COPP 32.7%WRND 14.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- COPP 0.61WRND 1.18
- Worst fall
- COPP −44.3%WRND −27.2%
- Market sensitivity
- COPP 0.95WRND 1.15
COPP and WRND in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
