Skip to content
etf.net

AGRW vs GUSE

Allspring LT Large Growth ETF

AGRWBNYSE Arca

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

GUSE −0.05pt a year

AGRW0.35%GUSE0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

GUSE 31.1×the volume

AGRW801GUSE24.9K

AGRW vs GUSE Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+4.1%AGRW+11.8%GUSE

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AGRW +4.1%. GUSE +11.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AGRW 0.35%
GUSE 0.30%, better
Fund size
AGRW $111M
GUSE $421M
1Y total return
AGRW +1.3%
GUSE No data
Holdings
AGRW 49
GUSE 122
Avg volume (30D)
AGRW 801 sh
GUSE 24.9K sh, better
NAV per share
AGRW $31.44
GUSE $46.05
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AGRW: Cost 93, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 43, Holdings 66, Durability 53. GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for AGRW, GUSE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAGRWGUSE
Cost30% weightA93A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53A94Higher
Tradability15% weightC43C46Higher
Holdings10% weightB66A89Higher
Durability5% weightC53A85Higher

Rank among US Active Growth funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AGRW and GUSE are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

GUSE ranks 2nd and AGRW 9th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 8AESLGEventide Large Cap Growth ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 9BAGRWAllspring LT Large Growth ETFScore 68
  6. Rank 9BFLCGFederated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETFScore 68

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AGRWBAllspring LT Large Growth ETF

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

In short

AGRW A concentrated bet on about 50 US growth companies, run by Allspring's stockpickers at 0.35%, well under the typical active growth ETF. It launched in 2025, so the strategy does the talking, not the track record.

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

Stated mandate

AGRW The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

Why people hold it

  • AGRW At 0.35% a year, it undercuts the typical active US growth ETF (cohort median near 0.54%) and even some of the top-rated names in the group, like LRGC at 0.39%.
  • Roughly 50 holdings, all US stocks. Tight enough that the managers' best ideas actually move the portfolio instead of getting diluted across hundreds of names.
  • No moving parts to decode: a standard 1940 Act ETF with one stated job, long-term capital appreciation from US equities.
  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.

Worth knowing

  • AGRW It opened in 2025, so there is very little history here. Risk and consistency measures rest on a short window rather than a full market cycle.
  • Small and thinly traded next to the category's giants, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads. Limit orders are the standard tool for funds like this.
  • Cash flows are sparse by design: distributions land annually or semiannually, and the mandate is appreciation, not income.
  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.

Full AGRW profile⁠

Full GUSE profile⁠

AGRW vs GUSE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AGRW vs GUSE Cost

Overpaying AGRW vs GUSE

$977

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AGRW 0.35%

    $7,126

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AGRW 0.35%
  • GUSE 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530AGRW $7,126GUSE $6,149

Year by year

YearAGRWGUSEOverpaying
10$634$545$89
20$2,454$2,113$341
30$7,126$6,149$977

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%AGRW
  • 0.30%GUSE, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

AGRW 5th cheapest of 90 funds

AGRW vs GUSE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
AGRW $0.04
GUSE $0.30
Ex-dividend
AGRW Dec 22, 2025
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
AGRW Dec 24, 2025
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
Frequency
AGRW Irregular
GUSE Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

AGRWIrregular · 1 paymentAll AGRW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2025 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

AGRW vs GUSE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AGRW 17.1%since Apr 2025GUSE No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AGRW 0.88since Apr 2025GUSE No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AGRW −16.5%since Mar 2025GUSE No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AGRW 1.32GUSE 0.93

Popular comparisons

  • AGRWBvsJUSAA

    Allspring LT Large Growth ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsJUSAA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AGRWBvsLRGCA

    Allspring LT Large Growth ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AGRWBvsFELGA

    Allspring LT Large Growth ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.