JUSA ranks 1st and AGRW 9th of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
AGRW vs JUSA
JUSA −0.17pt a year
0.35%0.18%
JUSA 123.3×the volume
80198.8K
AGRW vs JUSA Performance
+1.3%+10.8%
- AGRW 0.35%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- AGRW $111M
- JUSA $745M
- AGRW +1.3%
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- AGRW
- JUSA 0.72%
- AGRW 49
- JUSA 263
- AGRW 801 sh
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- AGRW $31.44
- JUSA $67.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGRW | JUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | C53 | A92Higher |
| Tradability | C43 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | A84Higher |
| Durability | C53 | A76Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. AGRW and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGRWB
JUSAA
In short
AGRW A concentrated bet on about 50 US growth companies, run by Allspring's stockpickers at 0.35%, well under the typical active growth ETF. It launched in 2025, so the strategy does the talking, not the track record.
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
AGRW The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGRW vs JUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGRW vs JUSA Cost
Overpaying AGRW vs JUSA
$3,377
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGRW 0.35%
$7,126
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGRW | JUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $328 | $306 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $1,281 | $1,173 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $3,749 | $3,377 |
- 0.35%AGRW
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
AGRW 5th cheapest of 90 funds
AGRW vs JUSA Dividends
- AGRW
- JUSA 0.72%
- AGRW
- JUSA $0.49
- AGRW $0.04
- JUSA $0.13
- AGRW Dec 22, 2025
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- AGRW Dec 24, 2025
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- AGRW Irregular
- JUSA Quarterly
Distribution history
AGRW vs JUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGRW 17.1%JUSA 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AGRW 0.88JUSA 1.41
- Worst fall
- AGRW −16.5%JUSA −14.0%
- Market sensitivity
- AGRW 1.32JUSA 0.98
AGRW and JUSA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

