QLD ranks 1st and AIBU 33rd of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
AIBU vs QLD
QLD −0.07pt a year
0.96%0.89%
QLD 686.7×the volume
6.04K4.15M
AIBU vs QLD Performance
−5.8%+10.7%
- AIBU 0.96%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- AIBU $24M
- QLD $13.3B
- AIBU −5.8%
- QLD +10.7%, better
- AIBU 1.82%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- AIBU 38
- QLD 113
- AIBU 6.04K sh
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- AIBU $65.26
- QLD $82.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AIBU | QLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51 | A72Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | D38 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | B56 | A81Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. AIBU and QLD are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AIBUC
QLDA
In short
AIBU The leveraged AI trade spread across a basket instead of one chip name: AIBU targets 200% of the daily move of a roughly 40-stock US AI and big-data index, resetting every trading day.
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
Stated mandate
AIBU The Fund seeks 200% of the Solactive US AI & Big Data Index’s daily performance before fees and expenses, resetting its target each trading day. It is not designed to deliver 200% of the index over periods other than one trading day.
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AIBU vs QLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AIBU vs QLD Cost
Overpaying AIBU vs QLD
$1,162
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AIBU 0.96%
$18,034
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AIBU | QLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,576 | $119 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $5,953 | $430 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $16,872 | $1,162 |
- 0.96%AIBU
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
AIBU 66th cheapest of 95 funds
AIBU vs QLD Dividends
- AIBU 1.82%, better
- QLD 0.15%
- AIBU $1.06
- QLD $0.12
- AIBU $1.06
- QLD $0.03
- AIBU Dec 10, 2025
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- AIBU Dec 17, 2025
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- AIBU Twice a year
- QLD Quarterly
Distribution history
AIBU vs QLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AIBU 57.1%QLD 36.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- AIBU 0.83QLD 1.04
- Worst fall
- AIBU −51.2%QLD −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AIBU 4.22QLD 2.46
AIBU and QLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
