Skip to content

ALDB vs BUFG

Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF

ALDBBCboe

FT Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF

BUFGDCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

ALDB −0.83pt a year

ALDB0.30%BUFG1.13%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFG 4.5×the volume

ALDB6.84KBUFG30.5K

ALDB vs BUFG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.7%ALDB+1.1%BUFG

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ALDB +1.7%. BUFG +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.5%2.5%3%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ALDB 0.30%, better
BUFG 1.13%
Fund size
ALDB $12M
BUFG $330M
1Y total return
ALDB No data
BUFG +9.6%
Holdings
ALDB 5
BUFG 8
Avg volume (30D)
ALDB 6.84K sh
BUFG 30.5K sh, better
NAV per share
ALDB $25.73
BUFG $29.76
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ALDB: Cost 100, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 39, Durability 11. BUFG: Cost 6, Risk 27, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings 44, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for ALDB, BUFG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarALDBBUFG
Cost30% weightA100HigherF6
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB56HigherD27
Tradability15% weightC41C48Higher
Holdings10% weightD39C44Higher
Durability5% weightF11A70Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ALDB and BUFG are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Laddered Buffer⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

ALDB ranks 3rd and BUFG 18th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BBUFPPGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETFScore 69
  2. Rank 2BPBFRPGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETFScore 68
  3. Rank 3BALDBAptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 4BIVVMiShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 17DONEZTrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buffered ETFScore 32
  6. Rank 18DBUFGFT Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETFScore 27

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ALDBBAptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF

BUFGDFT Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF

In short

ALDB No data

BUFG One ticket instead of a calendar. BUFG holds a basket of buffered ETFs, each tied to the price return of a big S&P 500 fund up to a cap with a defined cushion against losses, so you skip picking an outcome month yourself.

Stated mandate

ALDB No data

BUFG The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing in ETFs designed to provide returns based on SPY’s price return up to a predetermined cap, with a defined buffer against SPY losses over a one-year period.

Why people hold it

ALDB No data

  • BUFG A fund of buffer funds: one holding spreads you across several defined-outcome ETFs at once, instead of betting everything on a single start date.ftportfolios.com
  • The mechanism is the point: equity exposure to a large S&P 500 fund's price move, with a stated buffer against its losses over a one-year period.
  • Cheaper than the other fund built on the same reference: 1.13% a year versus BUFT's 1.21%.
  • Running since 2021, with a few hundred million dollars behind it, from an issuer with one of the deepest buffered-ETF lineups.

Worth knowing

ALDB No data

  • BUFG You pay for the packaging: 1.13% a year, above the roughly 0.79% median in its buffer-fund peer group and above laddered sibling BUFR at 0.95%.
  • Buffers come with caps. Upside is limited by design, and the buffer and cap apply across a full outcome period, so mid-period buyers get different terms.ftportfolios.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer ETFs, so bid-ask spreads can be wider. The mandate targets capital appreciation, not income, and it has not been paying distributions.

Full ALDB profile⁠

Full BUFG profile⁠

ALDB vs BUFG Holdings

How ALDB and BUFG differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ALDB and 0.0% of BUFG.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile99.5%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in ALDB and BUFG, widest gap first
SectorMore in ALDBMore in BUFG
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ALDB and BUFG, widest gap first
CountryMore in ALDBMore in BUFG
United StatesBUFG +0.5 points
SwitzerlandALDB +0.3 points
ChinaALDB +0.1 points
MexicoALDB +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ALDB100.0%
  • BUFG100.0%

Securities held

  • ALDB5
  • BUFG7

Asset class

ALDB
Equity
BUFG
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in ALDB5
  • In both0
  • Only in BUFG7

Only in ALDB

5 securities, 100% of ALDB by weight

  • Aptus October Deep Buffer ETF25.20%
  • Aptus January Deep Buffer ETF24.95%
  • Aptus April Deep Buffer ETF24.89%

Only in BUFG

7 securities, 99.9% of BUFG by weight

  • FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August15.07%
  • FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May14.97%
  • FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September14.69%

Weight gaps

ALDB and BUFG share no securities.

All ALDB holdings⁠All 7 BUFG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ALDB vs BUFG Cost

Overpaying BUFG vs ALDB

$14,615

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ALDB 0.30%

    $6,149

  • BUFG 1.13%

    $20,764

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ALDB 0.30%
  • BUFG 1.13%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530BUFG $20,764ALDB $6,149

Year by year

YearALDBBUFGOverpaying
10$545$1,981$1,436
20$2,113$7,403$5,290
30$6,149$20,764$14,615

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%ALDB, cheaper
  • 1.13%BUFG
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
  • Median 0.89%

ALDB cheapest of 18 funds

BUFG 17th cheapest of 18 funds

ALDB vs BUFG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
ALDB None
BUFG None

Distribution history

ALDBAll ALDB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFGAll BUFG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ALDB vs BUFG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ALDB No dataBUFG 7.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ALDB No dataBUFG 1.32
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ALDB No dataBUFG −17.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ALDB 0.46BUFG 0.67

Popular comparisons

  • ALDBBvsBUFPB

    Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF · PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFGDvsBUFPB

    FT Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF · PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.13% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ALDBBvsPBFRB

    Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF · PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFGDvsPBFRB

    FT Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF · PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.13% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ALDBBvsIVVMB

    Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFGDvsIVVMB

    FT Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF · iShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.13% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.