AMZD ranks 4th and IREZ 22nd of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AMZD vs IREZ
0.0%by weight
AMZD −0.47pt a year
1.02%1.49%
AMZD 6.0×the volume
12.2M2.03M
AMZD vs IREZ Performance
+9.7%+63.4%
- AMZD 1.02%, better
- IREZ 1.49%
- AMZD $18M
- IREZ $10M
- AMZD −5.6%
- IREZ
- AMZD 2.71%
- IREZ
- AMZD 3
- IREZ 2
- AMZD 12.2M sh, better
- IREZ 2.03M sh
- AMZD $9.03
- IREZ $26.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZD | IREZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | D25 |
| Mission | A96 | A97Higher |
| Risk | A72Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B67 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A70Higher | D39 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AMZD and IREZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZDA
IREZB
In short
AMZD Most single-stock bear funds reach for leverage. AMZD skips it: one dollar down for every dollar Amazon rises, for a single trading day, through swaps you buy like any share. 1.02% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
IREZ A one-ticker way to lean against IREN Limited. IREZ aims for two times the inverse of the stock's daily move, no margin agreement and no borrowing shares. Daily reset, built around short holding periods.
Stated mandate
AMZD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results tied to AMZN and is materially different from ordinary exchange-traded funds.
IREZ The fund seeks daily investment results corresponding to two times the inverse of the daily performance of IREN Limited.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZD vs IREZ Holdings
How AMZD and IREZ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AMZD and 0.0% of IREZ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AMZD and IREZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for AMZD and IREZ.
Concentration
- AMZD1816.7%
- IREZ184.8%
- AMZD1
- IREZ2
Asset class
- AMZD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- IREZ
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in AMZD1
- In both0
- Only in IREZ2
Only in AMZD
1 security, 100% of AMZD by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 506597.32%
Only in IREZ
2 securities, 100% of IREZ by weight
- Cfd Iren Ltd108.93%
- Cashusd75.82%
Weight gaps
AMZD and IREZ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZD vs IREZ Cost
Overpaying IREZ vs AMZD
$7,129
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZD 1.02%
$19,012
IREZ 1.49%
$26,141
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZD | IREZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $2,574 | $777 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $9,464 | $2,718 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $26,141 | $7,129 |
- 1.02%AMZD, cheaper
- 1.49%IREZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AMZD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
IREZ 31st cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD vs IREZ Dividends
- AMZD 2.71%
- IREZ
- AMZD $0.24
- IREZ None
- AMZD $0.05
- IREZ
- AMZD Sep 22, 2026
- IREZ
- AMZD Sep 29, 2026
- IREZ
- AMZD Quarterly
- IREZ
Distribution history
AMZD vs IREZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZD 27.4%IREZ
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZD −0.86IREZ
- Worst fall
- AMZD −74.7%IREZ
- Market sensitivity
- AMZD −1.26IREZ −5.89
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.