Skip to content
etf.net

ARKI vs QBQV

ARK DIET Q2 Buffer ETF

ARKIFCboe

AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF

QBQVBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QBQV −0.70pt a year

ARKI1.44%QBQV0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

QBQV 113.9×the volume

ARKI190QBQV21.6K

ARKI vs QBQV Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.4%ARKI0.0%QBQV

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ARKI +7.4%. QBQV 0.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.5%10%15%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ARKI 1.44%
QBQV 0.74%, better
Fund size
ARKI $1M
QBQV $53M
Holdings
ARKI 4
QBQV 3
Avg volume (30D)
ARKI 190 sh
QBQV 21.6K sh, better
NAV per share
ARKI $22.05
QBQV $26.64
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ARKI: Cost 7, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 11, Holdings 51, Durability 20. QBQV: Cost 81, Risk 59, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 99, Durability 48.
Pillar letters and Scores for ARKI, QBQV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarARKIQBQV
Cost30% weightF7A81Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD37B59Higher
Tradability15% weightF11B64Higher
Holdings10% weightC51A99Higher
Durability5% weightF20C48Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ARKI and QBQV are both graded against the same 8 Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Accelerated⁠

Category · 8 funds
See all 8 ›

QBQV ranks 1st and ARKI 8th of 8 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Accelerated Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQVAllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETFScore 69
  2. Rank 2BQTAPInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 58
  3. Rank 7CQAUCorgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40
  4. Rank 8FARKIARK DIET Q2 Buffer ETFScore 15

ARKI vs QBQV Holdings

How ARKI and QBQV differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ARKI and 0.0% of QBQV.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector10 Sectors51.4%
  • Countryby domicile91.9%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in ARKI and QBQV, widest gap first
SectorMore in ARKIMore in QBQV
TechnologyQBQV +32.2 points
Health CareARKI +25.7 points
FinancialsARKI +15.8 points
CommunicationQBQV +7.5 points
Consumer StaplesQBQV +6.3 points
IndustrialsARKI +6.2 points
UtilitiesQBQV +1.1 points
MaterialsQBQV +1.0 points
Consumer DiscretionaryARKI +0.9 points
EnergyQBQV +0.5 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ARKI and QBQV, widest gap first
CountryMore in ARKIMore in QBQV
United StatesQBQV +6.5 points
SwitzerlandARKI +4.8 points
CanadaARKI +2.2 points
TaiwanARKI +1.1 points
NetherlandsQBQV +0.9 points
Other countries (3)QBQV +0.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ARKI126.6%
  • QBQV102.8%

Securities held

  • ARKI4
  • QBQV2

Asset class

ARKI
Equity
QBQV
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ARKI4
  • In both0
  • Only in QBQV2

Only in ARKI

4 securities, 100% of ARKI by weight

  • Ark Innovation Etf109.75%
  • 4ARKK Us 03/31/27 C70.9714.84%
  • 4ARKK Us 03/31/27 P67.591.28%

Only in QBQV

2 securities, 100% of QBQV by weight

  • Qqq 12/31/2026 5.47 C97.48%
  • Qqq 12/31/2026 739.84 P4.74%

Weight gaps

ARKI and QBQV share no securities.

All ARKI holdings⁠All 5 QBQV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ARKI vs QBQV Cost

Overpaying ARKI vs QBQV

$11,119

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ARKI 1.44%

    $25,426

  • QBQV 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ARKI 1.44%
  • QBQV 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530ARKI $25,426QBQV $14,307

Year by year

YearARKIQBQVOverpaying
10$2,493$1,319$1,174
20$9,186$5,015$4,171
30$25,426$14,307$11,119

Expense ratio

  • 1.44%ARKI
  • 0.74%QBQV, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
  • Median 0.79%

QBQV 2nd cheapest of 8 funds

ARKI 8th cheapest of 8 funds

ARKI vs QBQV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
ARKI None
QBQV None

Distribution history

ARKIAll ARKI payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBQVAll QBQV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ARKI vs QBQV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ARKI 1.89QBQV 0.53

Popular comparisons

  • ARKIFvsQTAPB

    ARK DIET Q2 Buffer ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQVBvsQTAPB

    AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARKIFvsQTJAC

    ARK DIET Q2 Buffer ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQVBvsQTJAC

    AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARKIFvsQTOCC

    ARK DIET Q2 Buffer ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQVBvsQTOCC

    AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.