Skip to content
etf.net

ARKI vs QTOC

ARK DIET Q2 Buffer ETF

ARKIFCboe

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October

QTOCCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QTOC −0.65pt a year

ARKI1.44%QTOC0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

QTOC 53.6×the volume

ARKI190QTOC10.2K

ARKI vs QTOC Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.4%ARKI−2.0%QTOC

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ARKI +7.4%. QTOC −2.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.5%10%15%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ARKI 1.44%
QTOC 0.79%, better
Fund size
ARKI $1M
QTOC $16M
1Y total return
ARKI No data
QTOC +9.4%
Holdings
ARKI 4
QTOC 3
Avg volume (30D)
ARKI 190 sh
QTOC 10.2K sh, better
NAV per share
ARKI $22.05
QTOC $37.25
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ARKI: Cost 7, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 11, Holdings 51, Durability 20. QTOC: Cost 46, Risk 38, Mission not scored, Tradability 68, Holdings not scored, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for ARKI, QTOC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarARKIQTOC
Cost30% weightF7C46Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD37D38Higher
Tradability15% weightF11B68Higher
Holdings10% weightC51Not scored
Durability5% weightF20B57Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ARKI and QTOC are both graded against the same 8 Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Accelerated⁠

Category · 8 funds
See all 8 ›

QTOC ranks 4th and ARKI 8th of 8 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Accelerated Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQVAllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETFScore 69
  2. Rank 2BQTAPInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 58
  3. Rank 3CQTJAInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 51
  4. Rank 4CQTOCInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - OctoberScore 50
  5. Rank 5CQTJLInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETFScore 49
  6. Rank 7CQAUCorgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40
  7. Rank 8FARKIARK DIET Q2 Buffer ETFScore 15

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ARKIFARK DIET Q2 Buffer ETF

QTOCCInnovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October

In short

ARKI No data

QTOC Triple the upside, single the downside. QTOC uses options to seek 3x the Nasdaq-100's move up to a cap over a one-year period that resets each October, while carrying full exposure to declines. Accelerator, not airbag.

Stated mandate

ARKI No data

QTOC The Fund seeks to deliver three times QQQ's upside return up to a cap, while retaining approximately one-times downside exposure over a one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

ARKI No data

  • QTOC The 3x acceleration is measured across a full one-year outcome period, not reset daily, so there is no day-to-day compounding drift to babysit.innovatoretfs.com
  • The reference asset is plain vanilla: the Nasdaq-100 via QQQ. No stock picking, no sector tilt, just an options wrapper bolted onto a widely held index.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79%, it prices identically to Innovator's other accelerated QQQ funds (QTAP, QTJL, QTJA). The October start month is the differentiator, not the fee.

Worth knowing

ARKI No data

  • QTOC No buffer. The 3x runs one way: up to a cap on gains, while losses pass through at roughly one-for-one with the index.innovatoretfs.com
  • The stated terms belong to holders who own it from one October reset to the next. Enter mid-period and your effective cap and exposure differ from the headline.innovatoretfs.com
  • Small asset base and light trading, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than on mainstream index ETFs.

Full ARKI profile⁠

Full QTOC profile⁠

ARKI vs QTOC Holdings

How ARKI and QTOC differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ARKI and 0.0% of QTOC.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector10 Sectors48.7%
  • Countryby domicile91.9%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in ARKI and QTOC, widest gap first
SectorMore in ARKIMore in QTOC
TechnologyQTOC +31.3 points
Health CareARKI +26.4 points
FinancialsARKI +15.8 points
CommunicationQTOC +10.6 points
IndustrialsARKI +8.9 points
Consumer StaplesQTOC +6.6 points
UtilitiesQTOC +1.2 points
MaterialsQTOC +1.0 points
EnergyQTOC +0.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryARKI +0.2 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ARKI and QTOC, widest gap first
CountryMore in ARKIMore in QTOC
United StatesQTOC +6.5 points
SwitzerlandARKI +4.8 points
CanadaARKI +2.2 points
TaiwanARKI +1.1 points
NetherlandsQTOC +0.9 points
Other countries (3)QTOC +0.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ARKI126.6%
  • QTOC117.6%

Securities held

  • ARKI4
  • QTOC3

Asset class

ARKI
Equity
QTOC
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ARKI4
  • In both0
  • Only in QTOC3

Only in ARKI

4 securities, 100% of ARKI by weight

  • Ark Innovation Etf109.75%
  • 4ARKK Us 03/31/27 C70.9714.84%
  • 4ARKK Us 03/31/27 P67.591.28%

Only in QTOC

3 securities, 100% of QTOC by weight

  • Qqq 09/30/2027 7.41 C97.56%
  • Qqq 09/30/2027 739.77 C14.14%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20375.92%

Weight gaps

ARKI and QTOC share no securities.

All ARKI holdings⁠All 5 QTOC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ARKI vs QTOC Cost

Overpaying ARKI vs QTOC

$10,252

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ARKI 1.44%

    $25,426

  • QTOC 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ARKI 1.44%
  • QTOC 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530ARKI $25,426QTOC $15,174

Year by year

YearARKIQTOCOverpaying
10$2,493$1,405$1,088
20$9,186$5,331$3,855
30$25,426$15,174$10,252

Expense ratio

  • 1.44%ARKI
  • 0.79%QTOC, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Accelerated funds
  • Median 0.79%

QTOC 3rd cheapest of 8 funds

ARKI 8th cheapest of 8 funds

ARKI vs QTOC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
ARKI None
QTOC None

Distribution history

ARKIAll ARKI payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTOCAll QTOC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ARKI vs QTOC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ARKI No dataQTOC 11.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ARKI No dataQTOC 1.12
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ARKI No dataQTOC −33.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ARKI 1.89QTOC 0.76

Popular comparisons

  • ARKIFvsQBQVB

    ARK DIET Q2 Buffer ETF · AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QTOCCvsQBQVB

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October · AllianzIM Growth-100 Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARKIFvsQTAPB

    ARK DIET Q2 Buffer ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QTOCCvsQTAPB

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARKIFvsQTJAC

    ARK DIET Q2 Buffer ETF · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QTOCCvsQTJAC

    Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - October · Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.