Skip to content

ARKX vs XSPC

ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF

ARKXCCboe

VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF

XSPCDNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

ARKX0.75%XSPC0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

ARKX 234.8×the volume

ARKX589KXSPC2.51K

ARKX vs XSPC Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−2.6%ARKX−1.7%XSPC

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ARKX −2.6%. XSPC −1.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%30%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ARKX 0.75%
XSPC 0.75%
Fund size
ARKX $737M
XSPC $2M
1Y total return
ARKX −5.0%
XSPC No data
Holdings
ARKX 33
XSPC 23
Avg volume (30D)
ARKX 589K sh, better
XSPC 2.51K sh
NAV per share
ARKX $29.83
XSPC $18.29
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ARKX: Cost 29, Risk 68, Mission not scored, Tradability 86, Holdings 48, Durability 83. XSPC: Cost 29, Risk 33, Mission not scored, Tradability 57, Holdings 46, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for ARKX, XSPC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarARKXXSPC
Cost30% weightD29D29
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB68HigherD33
Tradability15% weightA86HigherB57
Holdings10% weightC48HigherC46
Durability5% weightA83HigherD35

Rank among Space funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ARKX and XSPC are both graded against the same 15 Space funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Space⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

ARKX ranks 3rd and XSPC 12th of 15 funds in the Space Category.

  1. Rank 1AUFOXDefiance Space and Connective Tech ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AROKTState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3CARKXARK Space & Defense Innovation ETFScore 54
  4. Rank 4CORBXGlobal X Space Tech ETFScore 51
  5. Rank 12DMARSRoundhill Space & Technology ETFScore 38
  6. Rank 12DXSPCVegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETFScore 38
  7. Rank 14FSPCLDefiance Pure Space Daily 2X Strategy ETFScore 16
  8. XWNGNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ARKXCARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF

XSPCDVegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF

In short

ARKX ARK's only space fund, and one of the rare ones in its niche run by stock pickers instead of an index. Roughly 40 global names spanning rockets, the technology that makes them work, and the companies that quietly cash in.

XSPC Most space funds spread bets across dozens of names. This one is anchored by SpaceX, launched in June 2026 days after that IPO, then widens out to satellite networks and orbital compute. Actively managed and openly concentrated.

Stated mandate

ARKX The fund seeks long-term capital growth by actively investing mainly in domestic and foreign equity securities of companies involved in space and defense innovation, including aerospace, enabling technologies, and aerospace beneficiaries.

XSPC The Fund seeks capital appreciation. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of assets, including investment borrowings, directly or indirectly in equity securities of SpaceX and other Space and AI Ecosystem Companies.

Why people hold it

  • ARKX Actively managed rather than index-tracked: ARK's team hand-picks roughly 40 names instead of buying whatever screens as 'space'.ark-funds.com
  • The mandate reaches past rocket builders to enabling technologies and aerospace beneficiaries, companies that profit from orbit without ever leaving the ground.
  • Global by charter, holding both US and foreign shares, so the theme isn't capped at American launch providers and defense primes.
  • Running since 2021 and actively traded at a decent size, which puts it in the upper half of the space-fund group on the practical stuff.
  • XSPC Built around SpaceX itself: the fund launched in June 2026, days after SpaceX's IPO, with the stock as its anchor position.businesswire.com
  • Active mandate, not an index sleeve: at least 80% of assets sit in SpaceX and other space and AI ecosystem equities, letting the manager move across the orbital stack.
  • The 0.75% fee lands right at the median for space funds, matching long-running active peers like ARKX and UFO.
  • Coverage runs the whole chain the issuer describes: launch and exploration, satellite connectivity, and the compute and data systems headed for orbit.vegasharesetfs.combusinesswire.com

Worth knowing

  • ARKX The 0.75% fee sits right at the median for space funds and above index-based rivals such as ROKT (0.45%) and ORBX (0.50%).
  • Roughly 40 holdings plus a human making the calls means single positions and ARK's stock-picking judgment both carry real weight here.
  • The stated goal is long-term capital growth, not income; the fund has not been making regular distributions.
  • XSPC Cheaper routes into the theme exist: UFOX charges 0.30% and ROKT 0.45%, both well under half this fee.
  • New and small: a 2026 launch means a short record, and trading has been light next to the category's largest funds, which can widen spreads.
  • Capital appreciation is the entire mandate, and the fund has not paid distributions, so income is not part of the package.

Full ARKX profile⁠

Full XSPC profile⁠

ARKX vs XSPC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ARKX vs XSPC Cost

Same expense ratio

$14,482

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ARKX 0.75%

    $14,482

  • XSPC 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ARKX 0.75%
  • XSPC 0.75%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530ARKX $14,482XSPC $14,482

Year by year

YearARKXXSPC
10$1,336$1,336
20$5,078$5,078
30$14,482$14,482

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%ARKX
  • 0.75%XSPC
  • Middle half of Space funds
  • Median 0.75%

ARKX 8th cheapest of 15 funds

XSPC 8th cheapest of 15 funds

ARKX vs XSPC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
ARKX None
XSPC None

Distribution history

ARKXAll ARKX payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XSPCAll XSPC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ARKX vs XSPC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ARKX 29.1%XSPC No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ARKX 0.96XSPC No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ARKX −43.5%since Nov 2021XSPC No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ARKX 1.64XSPC 0.91

ARKX and XSPC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ARKXCvsUFOXA

    ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF · Defiance Space and Connective Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSPCDvsUFOXA

    VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF · Defiance Space and Connective Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ARKXCvsROKTA

    ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSPCDvsROKTA

    VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ARKXCvsORBXC

    ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF · Global X Space Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSPCDvsORBXC

    VegaShares SpaceX & Beyond Earth ETF · Global X Space Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.